Michael Nunn vs. Bernard Hopkins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by pistal47, Dec 31, 2011.


  1. pistal47

    pistal47 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,779
    4,296
    Jul 14, 2007
    How does this fight pan out? Nunn is longer, faster, and just all-around much more physically gifted. On the other hand, BHop is one of the most cagey/ crafty fighters to ever enter the ring, and also one of the most skilled.

    BHop is considered by most to have a higher all-time ranking and greater legacy than Nunn, but Nunn is one of those h2h monsters. What goes down when these two step in the ring together, prime for prime, at middleweight?
     
  2. guncho

    guncho next champion! Full Member

    4,965
    515
    Oct 15, 2007
    Bhop by close boring MD 12
     
  3. Philip Marlowe

    Philip Marlowe Member Full Member

    320
    0
    Aug 14, 2010
    Yeah pretty much
     
  4. box101

    box101 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,088
    1
    Dec 19, 2009
    robert allen gave Bhop fits in there fights an he michael nunn was slick good punching much more refind fighter than allen an i use that analogy cuz allen was a southpaw fighter bhop faced during mw rein that possed a quarter of skills Michael "second too" Nunn possed. Nunn by ud imo
     
  5. pistal47

    pistal47 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,779
    4,296
    Jul 14, 2007
    I agree, I think Nunn takes it by about 3-4 rounds.
     
  6. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    20
    Sep 30, 2009
    Hopkins struggled with the speed of Jones, Taylor and Calzaghe. Nunn had comparible speed and reflexes, while being longer than all three and smoother than all three - with lots of movement and output. Nunn was something else in his prime.

    Nunn UD in a snoozefest.
     
  7. 2econd2nunn

    2econd2nunn New Member Full Member

    50
    0
    Jul 2, 2011
    nunn UD was just too black and too slick, tragic ending sadly
     
  8. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    Both have tools to give the other guy serious trouble. Nunn with his physical attributes and speed. Hopkins with his skill, roughhousing, and boxing brain. I think Hopkins takes it narrowly if we're talking about him at his middleweight best, though.
     
  9. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,308
    3,417
    Dec 11, 2009
    Hopkins has a style weakness to fast 2 handed fighters his own size, ie Jones Jnr, Taylor twice, Calzaghe, Pascal, Dawson etc.
    Nunn would be a fast 2 handed fighter the same size as Hopkins, which is a problem for Hopkins.
    Hopkins wouldnt be a push over but Nunn would win by close UD
     
  10. general zod

    general zod World Champion Full Member

    6,744
    51
    Apr 7, 2010
    Ive got Nunn by wide ud. Especially if the ref does not allow Hopkins to throw a right hand lead and then hold.