Not including Lewis which British HW give either Klitschko their toughest fight?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Manning, Jan 4, 2012.


  1. Boxing Gloves

    Boxing Gloves Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,522
    1,596
    Jul 19, 2004
  2. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    I voted Williams because he actually took his licks. Hide boxed then got ko'd by nothing, Haye was a ***** and Sosnowski ****ed me over and left me with a **** plumbing for a weekend longer than needed!
     
  3. roe

    roe Guest

    Are any of them British? No Suarez.
     
  4. Jimjom

    Jimjom Guest

    haye hide and williams?:huh

    but if you mean white british then no, but haye is mixed race - not that that means anything with regards to nationality
     
  5. roe

    roe Guest

    Was a joke. Not a very good one admittedly but still.
     
  6. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    Manning has some very strange opinions, most of them have nothing to do with boxing.
     
  7. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    Bob Fitzsimmons and Frank Bruno, nah Frank gets smashed.

    Fitz da man, but he gets battered IMO
     
  8. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    Honestly Id give Klitschko a better go than Haye, cause yeh Hed KO me in 1 but Id be right on him all the time and throwing,
     
  9. Tommy Bannister

    Tommy Bannister Member Full Member

    408
    0
    Aug 29, 2011
    When did soznoski stop being polish he's from Warsaw .
     
  10. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    That Sosnowski hes black aint he, from the ****ing Congo. 100% british
     
  11. Vano-Irons

    Vano-Irons Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,581
    8
    Jan 18, 2010
    Make no mistake, if Sosnowski had won, he would have been Polish.
     
  12. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    7
    Dec 5, 2006
    Its ****ing hilarious the way people claim that David Haye was a *****..? People need to realise that David Haye was and still is pound for pound are best fighter in this country. Fair enough he came up short against Wladimir Kiltschko, but he was not beaten up or made to look like a complete ******. He basically just didn't implement his game plan, with the acute accuracy which he has done in the past. He made Waldimir Kiltschko miss more than usual, and technically they both nullified each other, which makes it apparent that David Haye is! On Kiltschko's skill level.

    David Haye was giving away almost 3 stones in weight, people need to remember this. He is a old school fighter physically in this new full blown superheavyweight era.

    People sit here all day and wank over Carl Froch. Being all high mighty, walking forward and taking shots like a tree. Lets see Carl Froch fight at Crusierweight, Lets see Amir Khan fight at Light Heavyweight.

    It's not going to happen, because David Haye is of a different breed. Carl Froch would get sparked out by any decent european cw, maybe even top domestic cw will spark him out aswell.

    Thats the difference between David Haye & guys like Carl Froch. Carl Froch would not do ****, when he's out of his physical comfort zone. Because he lacks skills, he lacks athletic ability............"He's just a guy who can take a good shot at 168, and can bang alittle bit, and who has dedicated to boxing, he's not a gifted athlete"

    David Haye can still beat both Kiltschko's.