Poor raymundo beltran...two back to back robberies

Exactly, so where is your card? :yep

 

Just an expression!

What I mean is that Beltran did not leave no doubt in more than half the rounds. Ramos and Bogere won rounds clear and so did Beltran, thus making them close fights. You could make a case for Beltran, but the fact that you could also make a case for Ramos and Bogere (minus the "unofficial" knockdown) means they aren't robberies.

 

i thought ramos won the fight by a hair, it was a close fight, i didnt agree with the judges scorecards but i did give the fight to ramos.

 

At least Gomez makes for exciting fights and has some power.

 

The last few times I've seen him the fights were good, especially when I saw him against Granados here in Chicago.

 

You don't do round by round yet you have 7-3 scores? Based on what if not rounds? :huh

 

So freddy, which rounds did you think were clear for Beltran against Bogere and Ramos?

 

Some people score by "feel".


"Ah, that kind of seemed like a 116-112 to me." :yep

 

7-3 is kinda of an exact 'feel'. And it just happens to add up to the number of rounds? :roll:

 

atsch

You don't have to make an entire thread or write anything more than what's below, but it helps to know WHICH rounds you gave to WHICH person.

Round 1: 10-9 Boxer A
Round 2: 10-9 Boxer B

etc.



Otherwise you are in no position to ever discuss the scoring with anyone. You saying "7-3" is worthless unless you can back up which seven rounds specifically you gave to Beltran that others didn't. Then you and the person you're debating with can go back and review the footage of those rounds and state your cases for why you each scored that round as you did.