Mayweather Sr. "I talked to my son the other day and he said he had Cotto in mind"

Marquez, DLH, Mosley and Hatton weren't Floyd leftovers?

 

Cotto is DONE, Alvarez would smack the **** out of him. Floyd would destroy Miguel with ease, it wouldnt even be slightly competitive. At least Canelo is young, sharp and punches harder than Miguel. He'd have a far better chance of landing something to trouble PBF. Mayweather beats both but Alvarez puts up the better fight of the two.

 

Amazing how many people fail to see this. I thought you were smarter than this ESB :verysad

 

mosley is cottos left over, oscar is mosley's, jmm got his ass spanked by chris john.


everybody beating each other but nobody beating kell brook

 

Better choice as in more money, Id say Alvarez cause of Cinco de mayo and Cotto would be asking for a bigger share than Alvarez.

 

Im fairly confident he'll fight Alvarez he's green and undefeated doesn't stand a chance, heavier though Floyd will of course **** him out of any weight advantage he might of enjoyed, and he's mexican may 5 is a mexican independence holiday not a puerto-rican one so I'd imagine he'd fight the ginger taco and Cotto would be the second option if negotiations fail.

 

Holy **** I lol'd hard at the Mayweather Sr v Hearns statement. Prime or no prime I wanna see that.

 

They have the same chance to win, personally I'd rather see Canelo, but if casuals are more drawn to Cotto...whatever. Both are decent fights, I'd give Cotto/Canelo 15-20% chance to win.

 

Official Hearns vs. Mayweather Sr.....feel free to vote on it :good

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=11776330#post11776330

 

Alvarez is a bum.

 

I knew the money card would be played here. Money wise it did make sense, but as far as competitiveness it didn't. The weight drain played a huge part in that fight, which was the reason why Oscar was drained. Mosley wouldn't of brought in the same cash, but it would of been a better fight. Roach said himself, the reason they choose Oscar instead of Mosley, was because Mosley was the better fighter and Oscar brought in more Money. That statement is saying a lot. It's saying that it would not have matter if both fighters (Oscar and Mosley) brought the same amount to the table. Oscar would have still been the one to pick because of the weight drain and he was less of a threat compare to the two.

 

Too late. Pacs fighting Cotto.