Which fight would enhance Joe's legacy most, if he beat Bhops: Pavlik or Dawson...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Decebal, Feb 3, 2008.


  1. madpup

    madpup Active Member Full Member

    1,061
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    He has the undisputed championship already, that is a big deal.
     
  2. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Yeah...sure...but that doesn't necessarily mean he's better than Dawson.
     
  3. peter5

    peter5 Marco.A.Barrera Full Member

    3,727
    3
    May 7, 2007


    Surely it DOES mater who ends up having the better career!!!!!! If he fights Dawson and beats him, but Dawson does nothing afterwards, it wont hold a great torch to JC legacy.On the otherhand, if he fights Dawson, beats him, then Dawson comes back and totally wipes out the lhw division, it adds hugely to JC's legacy (same can be applied to pavlik)
     
  4. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Well, I agree that people usually say: "Ah! Look, Joe beat Dawson, who then remained unbeaten for the rest of his career and reigned as undisputed LHW, CW and HW titlist for the next 8 years! Imagine how good Joe must have been to beat Dawson!" But what if instead Joe beats the same Dawson who would have become a great undisputed champion, but does it so thorougly, by lacying, say, that Dawson becomes a broken wreck instead...people would usually say:" Ah, well! This Dawson fellow...looked good before Joe got to fight him, Joe beat him, but it turnd out he was but an overhyped bum! He hasn't done anything since!"

    People say such things usually, but the inference is unwarranted. Only warranted inference about Dawson's quality is on the basis of his form in very recent previous fights, judged against the quality of opposition on offer (a bit cyclical, but it's unavoidable), and the form showed against Joe on the night. What happens afterwards is much less relevant in judging legacy importance of win.

    If that were not so, everyone would know who e.g. Esteban De Jesus was.
     
  5. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    About the same.

    Pavlik is more accomplished. A Champ, possibly at P4P fighter.

    Dawson isn't so accomplished, but is naturally bigger, or at least started in a higher weight class.
     
  6. Smazz20

    Smazz20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,856
    1
    Dec 19, 2006

    Agree 100%. Did Jones beat a peak Hopkins? No. Then again it wasn't a peak Jones either, but both of them gained a lot of experience from the fight and became better from it. A fighter should get the respect from a win based on who he fought and how good that fighter was at the time he fought him. Sean gave a great example in another thread about how the Hopkins of 10 years ago was better than the Hopkins of today. Yet that Hopkins wasn't p4p ranked. Now however, he's a name and therefore, apparently, worthy of more respect!!

    At the moment, Pavlik is a bigger name. But beating someone he's beaten already shouldn't gain him as much respect as say beating Abraham. Dawson o the other hand is facing a seasoned vet and a dangerous prospect. He also is a LH champ with more technical ability than the 160 Pavlik. Dawson would be a better win for Joe, imo. Although I see no reason why he can't fight both.
     
  7. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Spot on!
    This way of looking at legacy and p4p is illogical and confuses the hell out of fans!

    :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup :thumbsup

    :deal :deal :deal :deal :deal
     
  8. peter5

    peter5 Marco.A.Barrera Full Member

    3,727
    3
    May 7, 2007
    I disagree, I think it is important what happens afterwards, in the case of Lacy, people now say he wasnt any good in the first place, not just the fact that Joe battered him and ruined him, people would no-doubt say the same about Dawson if Joe raped him in the ring too, therefore I do believe its important what the fighter achieves afterwards, its not the be all and end all, but its important
     
  9. Bomber

    Bomber Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,526
    0
    Jan 9, 2008
    In my Boxing fantasyworld it goes Hopkins UD, Pavlik KO10, Jones UD 12. Nice earners all the way, Sorts out Pavlik which takes out his main rival at middleweight/SMW and Jones for a Victory parade in Cardiff. Diamond.
     
  10. LockDog387

    LockDog387 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,629
    0
    Mar 23, 2007
    A win over Dawson would hardly mean anything, because he's still young and doesn't even have a deep resume. A win over Pavlik means he beat a top p4p fighter and a very dangerous opponent, that would be a high mark in Calzaghe's resume.
     
  11. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    id have to say dawson. beating the mw champ isn't as impressive as taking out an elite lhw. if pavlik can move up and do some damage first, then that could change. people nitpick oscar for cherrypicking smaller opponents so i dont think there is much difference here.
     
  12. Still~style

    Still~style Active Member Full Member

    930
    0
    Sep 4, 2007

    explain yourself.
     
  13. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    At this point, beating one wouldn't have any more effect on his legacy then beating the other. But at least Dawson is a LtHW, which Joe C will be in his next fight.
     
  14. RealIzm

    RealIzm Boxing Junkie banned

    12,032
    2
    Oct 12, 2007
    To early for this thread Decebal
    Diaconu will have Dawsons parents cowering under a blanket
    A better thread would be
    How many punches from Diaconu can Dawson take before being totally brutalised, mangled and beaten?
     
  15. bestdefense117

    bestdefense117 Young Gun Full Member

    532
    0
    Feb 1, 2008
    B-hop (who in my opinion is old and overrated) would do little, Dawson would be the toughest fight, But Pavlik has the better fan support and would do more for Calzaghe.