Why Does Pacquiao Need to Catchweight Cotto?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bballchamp11, Jan 25, 2012.

  1. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2010
    Messages:
    13,939
    Likes Received:
    4
    I agree, which is why this **** shouldn't happen period. If they want to challenge themselves at 154 go for it but don't bring the champion down in weight just to beat his ass for a name. Bull****.
     
  2. Conan

    Conan I AM THE DOCTOR Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    1,422
    Likes Received:
    3
    I thought he was fighting Mayweather?
     
  3. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,474
    Likes Received:
    3
    It is better to put others at such disadvantage so he can win even if "he isn't as hungry as he used to be". Right????

    That's the beauty of catchweights when you don't have to come down in weight.... you can still win a fight even if you don't have the desires to fight anymore. I love catchweights:yep
     
  4. vengeex

    vengeex Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,060
    Likes Received:
    0
    PAC's highest weigh-in weight was 145.75 lbs. for the 147 fight with Clottey.

    He weigh-in at 144.5 lbs. for the 150 fight against Margarito.
     
  5. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Messages:
    9,249
    Likes Received:
    1,729
    Catchweight or not, Cotto will get his ass whoopin again.
     
  6. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    79,438
    Likes Received:
    2,645
    Pac is already at a disadvantage being very small for his weight class.
     
  7. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2010
    Messages:
    53,088
    Likes Received:
    6,684
    To limit the possibility of a defeat.
     
  8. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,474
    Likes Received:
    3
    ..... therefore is better to put Cotto at disadvantage.
     
  9. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    51,943
    Likes Received:
    2

    That's the risk of being a B side. Been like that since the beginning of the sport.
     
  10. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    79,438
    Likes Received:
    2,645
    so that they both have a disadvantage. Pac because he is too small, and Cotto cause he has to cut extra weight.

    That's the whole point of a catchweight.

    I'd rather they both have a disadvantage than just 1 of them.
     
  11. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,474
    Likes Received:
    3
    Sure, and that's why catchweights suck...

    EDIT
    Not only catchweights suck, but also when a boxer imposes ring size... I am against that **** too.... I remember Leonard did it with Hagler?
     
  12. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,474
    Likes Received:
    3
    That's the idea that promoters want to sell to the public... but in reality if you have problems with cutting that "extra weight", which in reality isn't extra, is just extra for the one that weighs less than you, the one that has to cut the weight will suffer the consequenses of cutting that weight...

    Chances are that the one cutting the weight will be f*cked big time.
     
  13. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    79,438
    Likes Received:
    2,645
    and the smaller guy will suffer the consequences of being smaller.
     
  14. Fighting Pride

    Fighting Pride Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2009
    Messages:
    4,538
    Likes Received:
    1
    It's because he doesn't want to fight above 147 again. He weighed 144 for his fight at 150 and after the fight was forced to lie in the fetal position in a bed for a few days he was hurt that bad. Fair reason. He shouldn't demand Cotto go down to 147 though, he just shouldn't take the fight. Cotto has moved on is a 154lber now. Maybe fight him later at 150 when Cotto becomes ring champ and it means something.
     
  15. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    51,943
    Likes Received:
    2

    Catchweights aren't a big deal IMHO. Posters just make a big deal about them.

    The thing is, one should not even consider a fight if they believe it willl leave them too depleted to properly fight. All Cotto or ANYONE in that position has to say is 'No". Simple as that.


    Besides, is the WW limit of 147 considered a catch weight now? :huh I am aware Cotto is at JrMW. But if that's a catchweight. Isn't Floyd vs. Hatton a Catchweight fight? Was a guy who was at jrMW vs. a guy who was at JrWW in their previous fights. :huh

    Or Floyd vs. JMM? Floyd vs. Ortiz? Since Floyd went to JrMW, then down to fight these others? I guess since many like to call Pac vs. DLH a catchweight fight.

    That's why I don't really make a fuss over catchweight fights. For one, it allows certain big fights to be made. And two, it's up to the party to say no.