if you were Peterson, would you give Khan an immediate rematch?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by homebrand, Jan 26, 2012.


  1. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    And?

    You go onto say: "Personally, i think Khan has behaved disgracefully and been a sore loser"


    So it's about how you personally feel about Khan, that's determining whether a really good, high-in-demand fight should take place again. The benefits include:
    • Another potential FOTY
    • Peterson to make more money than against anyone else (bar JMM or Pac)
    • More hype than any other fight (bar JMM or Pac)
    • A chance to settle the score after a close, controversial split decision.
    • More credit to be gained for both guys, should they win.
    Yet you'd prefer Peterson to fight Katsidis and Prescott just to annoy Khan? :patsch

    Disliking a fighter because he's a **** is fine. Because let's be honest, Khan has indeed been a grade A **** since the loss. But don't let it get in the way of good fights, man. I mean, I despise Brandon Rios, but if you ask me for a list of fantasy fights to be currently made, he'd be mentioned four or five times; including those against my favourite fighters where he'd make tons of money. Same thing with Mayweather, Donaire, etc. I'd much rather pass up on the chance to see them get "annoyed", if it meant seeing them in good, exciting scraps. Too often we complain about fighters not taking the best fights, yet here you are, preferring them to do the opposite, just to satisfy your dislike for a fighter? :verysad
     
  2. Povetkinfan

    Povetkinfan Member Full Member

    499
    3
    Jan 26, 2008
    If Khan had successfully stolen back the belts, outside the ring, he would not have given Petersen a rematch. He'd have come out with some **** like, 'There's no point! I'd only beat him easier next time!'

    Khan's such a bullshitter that he probably starts to believe the lies he comes out with!
     
  3. homebrand

    homebrand Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,674
    3
    Jan 1, 2009
    again, don't be a douche. the thread is about if you were Peterson. I said 'personally', as in , if i were Peterson. keep up, there's a good boy.
     
  4. izmat

    izmat Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,611
    0
    Sep 19, 2008
    If I was Peterson I would want to fight Khan and beat him convincingly with a KO
     
  5. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    :nut

    Which kind of requires you to give your personal opinion, does it not? An opinion that would invoke personal feelings and preferences. It no longer becomes about Peterson when you let your own personal dislikes enter the equation.

    A better question would be: 'Looking at it from Peterson's perspective, should he give Khan a rematch?'

    In which case, yes, it would be better for him to give Khan a rematch if fights against JMM, Pacquiao, and even Bradley, aren't readily available. Reasons for doing so, are already given in the previous post. A Khan fight is also high-risk and high-reward. It's better for him to risk it against a top 140 name; where even if he loses, he'll still maintain a lot of credibility and have other fights to turn to. Risking it and losing against two guys who have been on a downward spiral for quite a while, would be a disaster.
     
  6. TheDon

    TheDon KO Artist Full Member

    3,434
    1
    Apr 19, 2008
    Probably. That money may not be on the table again if Khan moves up to 147.
     
  7. JunitoJab

    JunitoJab Antagonist Full Member

    5,222
    2
    Nov 17, 2009
    Yes, stick by your word. He offered the rematch. Wouldn't want a victory that seems tainted, no matter how much of a ***** Khan acted.
     
  8. TerryESB

    TerryESB The Final Boss Full Member

    13,376
    434
    May 4, 2009
    There was a conspiracy theory to rob Amir Khan in Washington DC, Lamon Petersons hometown.
     
  9. Champion

    Champion Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,083
    14
    Nov 28, 2011
    Nah, **** him. I'd fight Marquez in Mexico.
     
  10. hooligan

    hooligan Millionaire Bum Full Member

    4,499
    10
    May 8, 2006
    no i wont, unless the fight is in my hometown....as much i dont like khan, hometown robberies wont work in other places...
     
  11. philgood

    philgood Member Full Member

    356
    0
    Aug 26, 2009
    For the money it would be hard to turn down and the cards are stacked in Petersons corner as the champion and I feel that Peterson fights Khan better this time
     
  12. lazarus20000

    lazarus20000 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,247
    4
    Dec 7, 2008
    Peterson is not a well known name and will struggle to get a big payday. By rematching Khan he is promised 50% of all revenues including UK ppv which would be quite a bit. Plus it'll be on home turf in the US. It's really a no brainer to be honest as Peterson doesn't have an oponent that will offer him that much revenue. But if he did he would get beaten and he has the best chance of beating Khan than someone like Pac.

    Also if he beats Khan again at a top venue like Caesars Palace, his stock will rise considerably and fighters like Pac and Floyd would be more willing to fight him offering a big purse....

    Now the question is does Peterson believe that he can beat Khan........?
     
  13. eminentair

    eminentair Active Member Full Member

    678
    0
    Sep 13, 2008
    i believe there was enough controversy to yeild a second fight. but the because of the way khan has behaved, id tell him to go to hell. also khan would smash peterson in the rematch so id stay well clear of him
     
  14. SJS19

    SJS19 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,479
    14
    Jun 13, 2011
    I'd make him ask nicely, in public. Getting punched repeatedly in the head for 12 rounds didn't seem to humble him.
     
  15. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    275
    Jul 22, 2004
    I'd fight Pacquaio or Marquez over Khan