its that time again! a) David Haye v Thomas Adamek at Heavyweight b) Joe Calzaghe v James Degale at Super-Middle c) Amir Khan v Kell Brook at Welterweight d) Darren Barker v Kelly Pavlik at Middleweight e) Ricky Burns v Juan Diaz Lightweight f) Devon Alexander v Frankie Gavin at Welterweight:happy
this ones for a laugh im gonna leave it alone for a bit now before it gets boring come back in a month or so with these threads lol
All based on prime vs prime or recent form. The obvious controversial pick would be Frankie to beat Alexander, but with Devon giving the four minute warning each time he throws a shot it'll allow Gavin to set himself up nicely to counter.
Simply because Alexander has more top class experience than Gavin, should Gavin get his act together, he could be much better than Devon ever was
haye ko, calzaghe ko, brook ko, barker points, diaz points, devon points in a year or 2 if frankie gets sorted he would school him at this time u got to go with devon unfortunatly
David Haye v Thomas Adamek at Heavyweight: Haye TKO b) Joe Calzaghe v James Degale at Super-Middle: Calzaghe TKO c) Amir Khan v Kell Brook at Welterweight: Brook SD d) Darren Barker v Kelly Pavlik at Middleweight: Barker Pts e) Ricky Burns v Juan Diaz Lightweight: Burns UD f) Devon Alexander v Frankie Gavin Alexander UD. Devon's not a great fighter but far to early for Frankie and it takes a smart or unrelenting pressure fighter to be Alexander and Frankie's still a bit off that level. I think Brook could beat the current Khan but it would take a massive and assured display tactically and technically. Barker i just think could do it, Barker showed he's around world level and think he could muster up a win in a hard fight.
