Lost in the midst of last nights drama Galahad & Eubank Jr, your opinions!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by royalt0208, Feb 19, 2012.


  1. royalt0208

    royalt0208 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,252
    0
    May 1, 2009
    It's perfectly understandable that this bill was forgotten in the midst of the controversy from a certain fighters actions over the last few days. However somewhat unbelievably last night far more eye balls will have watches Kid Galahad and Chris Eubank Jr in action then the Heavyweight fight in question. So simply put what was your opinion of their respective performances last night, do you see a bright future for Galahad and Eubank Jr? And how do you feel Galahad would do against the likes of Munroe, Quigg and Frampton.
     
  2. royalt0208

    royalt0208 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,252
    0
    May 1, 2009
    I'm watching the show now and I have to say that Channel 5 did some great short features before the fights began. They did a good job and it's nice to see some decent production, a big improvement from when they talked about how many sweets Tyson Fury used to eat, gee that got me pumped.
     
  3. the quiet man

    the quiet man Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,554
    1
    Apr 20, 2010
    i was surprised a bit at eubank struggling in only his 2nd pro fight, but i suppose you can put that down to his hand injury.
    kid galahad, i think he's a good fighter, definatley british title class, he is gonna get compared to naz, but i dont think he'll have anything like the success naz did.
     
  4. royalt0208

    royalt0208 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,252
    0
    May 1, 2009
    Just watching the show now still on the Galahad fight so can't comment on Eubank. I agree with everything you say about Galahad, I would move him quite slow if I was Mick he is clearly still waiting to develop his man strength and he needs to get used to sitting on his punches, because I can't see him doing much to dissuade stronger fighters like Carl Frampton, Scott Quigg and Rendall Munroe.
     
  5. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    93
    Nov 10, 2008
    Think Galahad is a superb boxer, definitly one of the best pure boxer's around Britain today. I do thinkhis chin mightbe shaky though, and then theres the lack of power, although he seemed sharp enough last night.

    I'd fancy him to beat Frampton, but I think Quigg might be a tough one for him stylistically.However I'd say he is as good as those two if notbetter.
     
  6. Jack Dempsey

    Jack Dempsey Legend Full Member

    7,210
    42
    Jun 13, 2005
    My Sky+ cut off the Eubank fight so I wasnt best pleased, but Channel 5 do a good job in my opinion

    Was laughing my arse off at sweaty Fat Mick hulking out of his Mr Byrite suit
     
  7. Dan_D

    Dan_D New Member Full Member

    46
    0
    Jul 23, 2010
    Good performance by Galahad, but as the post above says he hasn't got the pop to dissuade the stronger fighters in the division.

    On a side note but anyone notice the slightly ******ed scorecard from Ian John Lewis? Scored the first round 10-10 with a knockdown?! Not that it should be an instant 10-8 round or anything, but does that mean it would have been a 10-8 round to Galahad without the knockdown?
     
  8. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    93
    Nov 10, 2008
    I scored the first round 10-10,Galahad won it clearly so a 10-9 round and Booth gets a point for the knockdown so 10-10
     
  9. royalt0208

    royalt0208 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,252
    0
    May 1, 2009
    It's because we know to expect this from Ian John Lewis. I'm sure he is a nice guy but he is a ****ing incompetent judge and ref and he needs to get relegated to four and six rounders at best.
     
  10. Dan_D

    Dan_D New Member Full Member

    46
    0
    Jul 23, 2010
    It was a clear round to Galahad so I see where you are coming from, but I can't imagine many people scored it that way - It's unusual to see a drawn round with a knockdown, not that it was important in the fight as a whole, but if it was a close fight I would imagine it being quite controversial!
     
  11. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    Galahad was good, he does tend to get blase and admire his work a little, and he gets caught while doing so. Maybe it's a concentration issue. As said previously, he doesn't really have the power to dissuade the stronger fighters, and in a war of attrition I see him getting worn down.
     
  12. royalt0208

    royalt0208 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,252
    0
    May 1, 2009
    Agree with that, the good thing it that he is only 21 and that was only his eleventh professional fight and first test so he has plenty of time to work on that. As I said above I hope he is moved slowly he looks physically weak at the moment but that will come as he gets older no need to throw him to the wolves, get him tough durable opponents that will cause trouble like Robbie Turley or Franklin Varela.
     
  13. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009

    :rofl :rofl :rofl

    WTF !!!!!!!!!

    :yikes
     
  14. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Galahad looked good. Some good skills, got some good experience last night but needs to work on his power.

    Didn't get to see Eubank JR yet because my Sky + cut out after 98 mins.