Why can't Haye work his way up and become a mandatory!?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by iceferg, Feb 23, 2012.


  1. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    The competition with the younger guys is weak. They have very little skill IMO.
     
  2. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,766
    Jul 21, 2009
    If Haye became mandatory challenger then there'd be no contract issues and the oh-so-scared K brothers couldn't run away from him!

    So why exactly is Haye not simply becoming mandatory. That would guarantee a fight with either brother!
     
  3. kk17

    kk17 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,177
    917
    Jun 23, 2007
    :admin Povetkin-Huck winner , Thompson, Solis, Helenuis, Mike Perez, Pulev-Dimitrenko winner

    even the winner of Kevin Johnson vs Alex Leapai is more worthy
     
  4. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    197
    Oct 11, 2010
    Haye can't get a mandatory shot because it means fighting a live contender in eliminator rather than shot Ruiz or Harrison. Besides, mandatory shot secures only 30% of the purse - the offer which Haye already declined.
     
  5. dendy

    dendy no easy way out Full Member

    2,515
    0
    Apr 10, 2010
    :good
     
  6. 4ybak

    4ybak Member Full Member

    380
    1
    Jul 8, 2007
    very very good question:deal
     
  7. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,462
    2,426
    Apr 25, 2008
    I don't understand anyone backing Haye. To be honest I'd rarther see Haye against someone like Fury, Chisora, Price, Aareola, Povetkin etc. Than Haye against either Klitschko. At least in those fights Haye will be under pressure to win. The Klitschko fight was boring and I won't buy into that hype again.
     
  8. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,462
    2,426
    Apr 25, 2008
    If Haye's really only in it for the money then I cba to pay to watch him pick up a pay check, if he wants to be a champ then he shouldn't mind working his way up.
    As has already been proven, a Chisora type figiter who wants to win will make a better fight than Haye.
     
  9. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,462
    2,426
    Apr 25, 2008
    Actually mate I'm not coz Haye doesn't seem to be able to get a shot at either.
     
  10. millertime1367

    millertime1367 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,777
    1
    Sep 11, 2008
    There's no 'G' in mandatory
     
  11. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    24
    Jul 28, 2008
    6 fights in 4 years.... no one earns shots these days but the fact haye would even attempt to put a string of wins together at this point to get a shot is not gonna happen.
    in 9 years he has only 27 fights.... they guy doesnt like to fight as it stands....
     
  12. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,862
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    before you pat each other on the cocks remember that Ruiz was Haye's mandatory challenger. :deal

    Now carry on hating the cash cow of europe.
     
  13. dendy

    dendy no easy way out Full Member

    2,515
    0
    Apr 10, 2010
    mandatory or not, makes no difference as he was shot and no threat.. David new this..
     
  14. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,862
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    still he was his mandatory, if he didn't fight him he would have gotten stripped of his WBA title.

    so Haye doesn't have to fight his mandatory but klits do?

    cool story white boi.:good
     
  15. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,564
    8,123
    Sep 2, 2011
    Yes, let Vitali fight Adamek again or perhaps Helenius, that's far better.