Refute anything that I posted and I will admit to your tiresome claims of my trolling. The thing is, you won't be able to do so because everything I said of Khan is true. He is a joke. Now, uttercunt, you go back to snorting crystal and poppers in your igloo.:rofl:hi:
Khan. He talks a lot of trash, and i hate the ppl that surround him, but he fought everyone he had to fight. Bradley ducked Khan.
Amazing timing? Yes, I suppose it does take amazing timing to shoe-shine flurries to your opponents gloves.:roflatsch British Boxing fans are so inadvertently hilarious when they desperately try to salvage their Glass Jawed heroes' reputations as their careers tailspin.
I have never been impressed with Amir Khan. I think MentalMandible hit the nail on the head with his first post describing Khans style as well. Sure he is fast, and sure what he does LOOKS impressive, it's pleasing to the eye because of all the hustle and bustle, but there's nothing to it. He doesn't have any real power, Peterson exposed that quite handily. He doesn't fight like a particularly skilled or technical boxer, it's as MentalMandible said "A lot of back peddling until he can stop and put a pitter-patter on his opponent". I've watched a number of Khan fights and this is the modus operandi for him every time out. You know who he reminds me of??? A slightly more disciplined Prince Naseem Hamed. Think about it. He doesn't have a particularly great chin, he doesn't have particularly great technical skills, he is kind of a wild fighter with good speed and decent accuracy, he's loud-mouth-arrogant Muslim Brit, he can't take a loss and is a poor sport, and he's over rated. The only BIG difference I see there is that Khan doesn't have nearly as elaborate ring entrances which makes him less entertaining, and he doesn't have the kind of knockout power that Prince Naseem Hamed did. Otherwise, welcome to your new Prince Naseem Hamed. I foresee that he will also end up like Hamed, getting his ass kicked and getting exposed for his lack of technical boxing skills and basic fundamentals. I can't say I'm a big fan of Timothy Bradley, but I can say I respect him a lot more than I do Khan. I don't care if he ducked Khan, he did the smart thing in holding out for Pacquiao, and now he is in a much better position to make a much bigger payday than Khan who is now just hoping that the guy who kicked his ass gives him a rematch. So, from Timothy Bradley to Amir Khan "How you like me now *****?":hi:
i like both but both believe there own hype and can you blame them ? tim bradly is the best at 140 and top 3 at 147 behind only mayweather and pacman.
Khan is a completely different fighter to Naz, who was a brilliant counterpuncher with knockout power with both hands. Khan is more of a fast combination puncher who overwhelms. And your big difference is pretty much everyone Vs Prince - noone did an entrance like the Prince did. Other than them both being muslim, theres not much to compare if I may say so.