Rank these 12 boxers by resume / ATG ranking

ATG ranking, as mentioned in the title...I take that as a mixture of resume and head to head ability. If you go by resume, Holyfield is #1 imo.

 

I know this wont be going anywhere cause I can recognise a Roy Jones fanboy a mile away. but listen. how do you know how Roy would do against other ATG greats of other eras when he didnt even face the greats of HIS OWN era?
Tarver knocked his ass out and Im sure other ATG lightheavyweights would have done the same

 

What greats did he not fight?

 

1.) Roy Jones
2.) Holyfield
3.) Mayweather
4.) De La Hoya
5.) Lewis
6.) Mike Tyson
7.) Morales
8.) Hopkins
9.) Barrerra
10.)Marquez

 

Michalczewski, Eubank, Steve Collins, Nigel Benn

 

Two things:

A number of LHW's would have beaten Jones.

You're statement about Roy not facing other ATG's of his own era is incorrect.

 

Right, because those guys are ATGs Not saying he was right in not fighting some of them, but you need to brush up on your history if you seriously consider them all-timers.

 

dude you better log the **** out and never come back to this place.
if Michalczewski isnt an ATG, then neither is Hopkins or Archie Moore.
Nigel Benn and Eubank and Steve Collins are WITHOUT A DOUBT Hall of fame boxers. now **** off

 

Those guys aren't even top 100 ATGs...they were belt holders.

 

Tats a tough list....if Hopkins keeps going I think he has to be #1. By keep going I mean defend his title 2-3 more times. I hate Lennox, but he is #1 in my opinion.

 

first of all, Roy Jones is a top 50 ATG, at best. Because he ducked the aforementioned 4 hall of famers. Miguel Acosta is a beltholder, Roberto Garcia was a beltholder. Benn,Eubank and Collins are hall of famers, but I am not surprised your ******ed ass doesnt know the difference between a beltholder and a HOF'er. I m sure you dont even know the difference between a jab and an uppercut.