You say that like Mosley is some sort of nobody. He's a great boxer who's never been stopped, no shame in "only" winning on a decision.
mosley is 36, cotto is in his prime and if he is such a hard puncher, he should have finished the old man but he didn't come anywhere close to even seriously hurting him.
wanna do the comparison: Floyd Mayweather could not hurt the 35 year old Oscar De La Hoya who has been knocked out by a 39 (not sure, might be 38) year old Bernard Hopkins.
What is known is that Mosley was dominated by Forrest, Winky and DLH yet Cotto Struggled with him way past his prime. No shame in that but you have to see how others have done against Mosley to measure fighters sometimes.
there are lots of harder punchers than cotto at 147, its ok to say he'd beat mayweather based on styles but dont mention his power..it'd be useless against floyd
who? - no it won't. Castillo had power: Castillo rocked Mayweather. Cotto has more power: He might actually hurt Mayweather.
castillo was a very big strong lightweight...even as a lightweight he had more power than cotto. keep trying though
Look it's definitely not dumb and based on theirs styles it is very possible that it happens. Obviously the guy who's nuts you worship will be the favorite, but we are just discussing our ideas and sharing our oppinions about the fight's outcome, so watch your mouth you ****ing cheerleader!!!!!:nono
Well the argument can be made that Mayweather who has alot more power, alot more accuracy, alot more ring expeience in big fights, and alot more speed than Demarcus Corley who is a light hitting guy who had Cotto nearly out on his feet and who Cotto outweighed by 17 pounds can defitnately hurt Cotto. :good