Wilczewski Polish legend??? He never fought against someone strong. Decent Curtis Stevens took him down. How we were supposed to name him a legend? LOL
Howabout Adamek :think Please, you all thought Proksa would be your golden child and the fact is that he got out fought by a British lower class Journeyman who couldn't last three rounds with any of the British fighters that you noted. Kell Brook has put a huge strain on the Polish NHS forcing budget cuts across the nation, you are close to tears; go on, cry... cry at the feet of Kell almighty.
Heavyweight: Chisora vs Adamek ---- 40-60 Why Chisora? Price is better. Cruiser: Afolabi vs Wlod --- Wlodarczyk isn't our best cruiser Alofabi - Masternak 50-50 L/hw: Clev vs Fonfara Cleverly is highly overrated. Also Fonfara isn't our best fighter. Cleverly - Kostecki 50-50 S/mw: Froch vs Wilczewski 100 - 0 Mw: Barker vs Proska 80-20 Lmw: Rhodes vs Jonak 30-70 Ww: Brook vs Jackiewicz (Jackiewicz is past prime. But even in prime he was decent) 100-0 Lww: Khan vs Mlodzinski (Who the hell is Młodzinski?) 100 - 0 Lw: Burns vs Szot (Szot is a bum. He works all day, boxing is his hobby) 100 - 0
Rhodes is past prime, but he has the technical skills to pull through that fight IMO. Also factor in that the fight would be in Britain.
:rofl Proksa got exposed as a technically awful fighter who lacks both fundamentals and the heart to dig down and fight, he was supposed to blow Hope away and ended up in the fight of his life. He sucks.
Again i will repeat what i have stated in the past. I havent seen the Brits this happy over a gift decision since Haye vs Valuev or Froch vs Dirrell:thumbsup
I can see an argument for Proksa winning, but wouldn't call it a robbery. It was Eddie Hearns show, and Proksa was one of Hearn's bigger stars, so the notion that the Pole was robbed is stupid. atsch I think National pride might be clouding your vision.