Personal opinions on PFP rankings are not based on what the judges saw. If you saw JMM beating Pac then it makes no sense to rate Pac higher. It also makes no sense to put JMM ahead of FLoyd for beating Pac when Floyd beat JMM:huh Floyd JMM PAC Makes sense to me.
At lightweight he fought the weakest possible titlist... Its as bad a the Canelo-Hatton title fight. And Roach clearly said he did not want Shane Mosley, even at 140. It's not who he didn't fight, it's who he fought and under what conditions. -Oscar at 147 is hailed as one of Pacquiao's biggest wins, yet Mosley beat a prime Oscar. -Margarito is considered a very good win for Pacquiao, yet Mosley KTFO a better version of Margarito. -Cotto is considered one of his best wins at 147, Tony had alreday KTFO Cotto, and every knew Cotto wasn't at his best anymore. The question then arises, is it ALL coincedence that Pacquiao kept fighting fighters who had recently looked very vulnerable, and at catchweights? Pacquiao is good...But calling really good fighter overrated because he has made a career of beating fighter removed from their prime and at catchweights doesn't diminish the fighters he beat, because the fighters he beat were already diminished. -Morales who Pac beat who also had previous losses to Barrera, and Raheem was a diminised version of the Morales of 2000. -Marquez? Marquez was KD 4 times aganist Pac, but he also imo has won 25 rounds out of the 36 they have fought... So how is the diminishing Marquez, who btw was old as **** in the 2nd and 3rd fights. -Barrera has also not been the same fighter since 2000... And if you followed boxing back then, it was the consensus the both Morales and Barrera left something in the ring after their first war, and their rematch proved that the intensity was not the same anymore. It's annoying when a fighters zooms through a division and beats a paper champion, no defenses, fights for a belt at a catchweight and neither fighter deserve to have that title fight because they haven't even done **** in that division and he calls himself an 8 world champion, it's an injustice to the true ATG who fought the best for their status.
The vast majority of people feel JMM beat Pac 2-3 times, and that he was robbed by Arum for financial gain.
Wow, end thread ****ing one man *******cutioner... and bogotazo... y'all getting owned by the best.:thumbsup
The truth is PAC is #1 or #2 depending on the P4P list you are quoting. "your list" isn't very credible. But I like your enthusiasm.
Not really. . . Out of all the non-biased scorers (not filipino, nor mexican media), it was basically dead even. . .
This ignorant trolls knows more boxing than you know the multiplication table. A good number of intelligent people agree with my way of thinking, it's obvious JMM ranks ahead of Pacquiao on the p4p list. Pacquiao lost 3 times.. to the same man.
? Other people don't accept it? Many others do, it's just that *******s have their heads shoved so far up their asses they can't accept this universal fact.