ok ok ok...for reals...the only "gift" desicion was the first fight with b-hop...a little with winky..but not as bad as LEWIS vs HOLYFIELD draw..so...yeah..but he wouldnt have had those BIG fights if it had not been because of the first ROBBERY...
Im sorry but u need to STFU!! I said it was my opinion. I as a boxing fan who paid to watch these fights, can express my opinion like everyone else. U dont have to agree with it, but DONT take it up the ASS!!! :smooch
There have been no robberies on Taylor's record. Close fights are exactly that...close fights I have no problem with his record. I haven't agreed with all the final decisions but have no problem accepting I just disagree and the judges saw it a bit different. For his supposed close fights I personaly have them.. 1-1 with Hopkins 0-1 with Wright 1-0 with Spinks, not sure why there's much contention to this one 0-2 with Pavlik So why I might not agree with all the final verdicts, I would never complain because his close fights could go either way. Jermain Taylor is a class fighter who fights the best on a consistent basis.
He won all except: Pavlik 1 Spinks Winky Wright Yes both BHOPs fights BHOPs didnt do enough. He beat Pavlik 7-5 for my money, Pavlik missed most of his shots and was less effective
I think he lost both times to Hopkins. I think a draw was fair against Winky. He beat Spinks. So i would say 4 losses.
Some of you are ****ing crazy. In my eyes he beat Winky, Spinks, and B-Hop the first time, and the second time had it as a draw with Bernard. I think his only legit loss is the first Pavlik fight.