If Wlad wins, is he Champ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by j0hn0, Feb 19, 2008.


  1. j0hn0

    j0hn0 double up on the jab Full Member

    773
    192
    Feb 16, 2006
    this old question again, but i wanna see what people think. i dont think beating ruslan really proves all that much, but i wouldnt mind seeing the wbc belt come together with the other two, especially if its a rematch against sam peter. saying s-1 is "just a title holder" when he holds two of the four belts and has beaten the divisions best does seem a lil dumb tho.

    personally i think the winner of this is THE heavyweight champ of the world.
     
  2. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Not the RING Champion, but I would consider him "the champion" in my new heavyweight rankings.
     
  3. Jose FM

    Jose FM Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,612
    1
    Apr 29, 2007
    Definitely the Ring champ, he already beat Peter, and beating a legitimate HW title holder in SI would propel here above everyone else.
     
  4. Vantage_West

    Vantage_West ヒップホップ·プロデューサー Full Member

    20,868
    642
    Jul 11, 2006
    first unification in many many years. we all know he is the best heavywieght but only by a slim margin.
    holding two titles would convince everyone that he is number 1
     
  5. amhlilhaus

    amhlilhaus Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,840
    12
    Mar 24, 2005
    it's not a unification, but another victory over a top ten guy is impressive.
     
  6. Alec900

    Alec900 New Member Full Member

    58
    0
    Feb 18, 2008
    for me,he allready is.
     
  7. rr94

    rr94 Belt Holder Full Member

    1,738
    0
    May 25, 2007
    :good
     
  8. bachatu

    bachatu Pro Full Member

    4,779
    8
    Feb 25, 2006
    Sure that would confirm on paper he is the better of the current heavyweights. Though, If Peter beats Maskaev, people want to see a rematch between Wlad & Peter. Both have improved since last time they met.
     
  9. D M Smith

    D M Smith New Member Full Member

    64
    0
    Oct 3, 2007


    I dont see how you can say Peter has improved?
     
  10. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    no, he is number 1 but not the champ until he unifies the big 4 in my eyes
     
  11. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    No....

    I only need him to unify 3 of the titles though to consider him champ.
     
  12. 196osh

    196osh Mendes Bros. Full Member

    14,565
    11
    May 10, 2007
    He would be the best, but he would need to unify to be the "champ".
     
  13. DamonD

    DamonD Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,285
    41
    Nov 19, 2004
    I think's already the top heavyweight around.
    I have Sultan as about my #5.

    But I'd rather it was either the WBC or IBF belt he was unifying than the WBO...least amount of history to it.
     
  14. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,240
    5,916
    Apr 30, 2006
    Yes. He's already viewed as the man to beat, but getting two out of the 4 straps should be enough for the mainstream to consider him "the champ", if they haven't done so already.

    People who want to dangle the term "champion" above him usually have an ulterior motive in doing so. 2 out of the 4 belts, and the perception of being the best, has been enough for anyone else in other weight classes to be considered "champion".
     
  15. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,846
    0
    Sep 10, 2005
    He needs to unify the three titles to be champion. Beating a WBO champion just amounts to another title defence.