Calzaghe's Curse

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BADINTENTIONS2, Feb 19, 2008.


  1. C HOP

    C HOP The World Awaits Full Member

    4,158
    61
    Nov 30, 2007
    i belive they will remember him , in the 60,70s there was very low video coverage where as now there are loads of video archieves of great fights tarver and jones triliogy will be 1 of them, but im not defending joes resume of great boxers im not , im just saying that boxers will be remeberd from there fights no matter who they fought or when! joes a great fighter in my opinon but you dont belive that if calzaghe fights these fighters and retires unbeaten then over a period of time he wont be classed as a great fighter
     
  2. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    good post but it goes beyond that.

    calzaghe wasn't ducked because a belt alone doesn't entitle you to that much. like i said before you need rep, a fan base and network interest and ANY promoter worth his salt knows this.

    if you don't pursue this you have no leverage or weight so it's all hot air. just because a fighter with a belt calls out another one does not mean he is 'ducking' him. it's simple mathematics and it's only a question of understanding this.

    jones ruled the light heavies but still got toney and hopkins.

    hopkins ruled the middles and still got oscar and tito - granted they were fights made at his weight and in his favour BUT i don't see any example in the modern day where dollars talk and bull**** walks that didn't give a legitimate long-term champion a defining fight that he could boast on his resume. except calzaghe.

    when hopkins met calzaghe at the floyd-hatton weigh-in, calzaghe said "could you beat mikkel kessler?" and hopkins replied, "who is mikkel kessler?".

    it was a taunt and it worked - but it worked because hopkins had built up his rep and, maybe calzaghe really is blind to warren's ways, but there's just no way that was going to hold any salt.
     
  3. shelterr

    shelterr Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,886
    0
    Sep 7, 2006
    I just wish calzaghe had fought these guys in their prime...i'd give him a hell of shot, but we'll never know
     
  4. D_knowsboxing

    D_knowsboxing The King is back Full Member

    1,971
    1
    Feb 4, 2008
    :rofl Dang Bhop!! way to take the guys most prized victory and step on it. Definate mind **** there. But Bhop shouldn't forget that he is 43 and not as young as he used to be. I think the only thing he has going in his favor is the fact that Calz fights go to the cards. Meaning bhop probably won't get KTFO, but a TKO due to Calz work is possible.
     
  5. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    that's right. hopkins is the itch he could never scratch because..he could never get hopkins to fight him when it really mattered
     
  6. HOF

    HOF Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,873
    0
    Feb 10, 2008
    Depends what Calzaghe intends to do from here on in. If he really means this 2 more fights then retire stuff he's been saying then he will have failed to fulfil his 'promise'. Agree with what has been said about him not breaking away like Hatton did, but then Hatton is presently at a weight range where he's been able to carefully pick from a pool of credible opponents in the US to build up his image. Having said that Calzaghe should've forced the issue and fighting the likes of Mitchell and Brewer in the US istead of Cardiff would've made more of an impact. I was at those fights and althought the arena was full it was only in the 5,000 capacity CIA in cardiff so it wouldn't have been like turning down a 50,000 home crowd. But now there are a number of potential big fights to enhance and consolidate a legacy so hopefully this "2 fights tops then I'm retiring undefated" stuff isnt for real
     
  7. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    well fighters will be remembered for who they fought and when because there is a better record of it. it's only a naaive point of view that judges a fighter simply based on his record - especially in this day and age. and that isn't going to change.

    education comes from reading between the lines.
     
  8. FRKO

    FRKO "A MAN" Full Member

    3,088
    0
    Nov 24, 2007
    I disagree with "Calzaghe won't be remembered as a great fighter" which D_knowsboxing posted.
     
  9. FRKO

    FRKO "A MAN" Full Member

    3,088
    0
    Nov 24, 2007
    D -- Yes mate, of course we know Bernard isn't what he used to be (although Bernard himself might argue against that), but like I already said, it's not like Calzaghe wasn't pursuing the big names such as Jones and Hopkins. We know Bernard ducked Joe, this is common knowledge, and, according to Warren, Jones also ducked Joe (more than once, I think). It's hard to take away credit from Joe for not fighting the big names when they ran from him. It kinda gives more credit to him, and less to Jones and Hops, if anything!

    I hate the way the business is structured. American's have everything their own, egotistal way most of the time and it kinda pisses me off. No disrespect to any USA peeps on the board here, don't take that comment personal. ;) The world doesn't, and shouldn't, revolve solely around America.
     
  10. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    you're right that hatton had more to pick and choose from. his weight range and relevant divisions were a lot healthier than calaghe's were.

    but - a full arena, regardless of numbers, is irrelevant at the end of the day. the bigger picture is about momentum, gaining revenue ( a small part of which is from the live takings) and from the 'muscle' you gain from being a universally-recognised 'name' fighter.
    that's what gives you something worth taking notice of on the negotiating table.

    jones and hopkins never were prime PPV fighters despite the fact they were arguably the best fighters of their era. i doubt many would argue against jones anyway.

    oscar and trinidad were the cashcows of the 90's - they both still pull big weight now and it may be a long time before oscar is eclipsed which is detrimental for boxing.

    oscar fought tito and hopkins.

    tito fought roy and bernard.

    roy has called out oscar in recent months.

    so we all know this isn't coincidence.

    ricky hatton was never any of these guys but you're quite right to say that he worked his way up the ladder. however, he was doing it to fulfill a dream. he wanted to test himself against the world's best fighter.

    for my mind joe calzaghe will always be a more talented fighter than ricky hatton, but even after he fights 44 year old bernard hopkins, 40 year old roy jones and, his best option, kelly pavlik, he'll never sit as high as hatton does with me because he's a fighter who protected his record and used his weight as an excuse.
    hatton chased his dream and didn't look to protect anything once he got out of warren's clutches.

    now that he's 35 (calzaghe) he's actually decided to step up and fight a fighter who will be remembered as great - but it's a fighter he should have fought 8 years ago.

    you listen how warren and calzaghe talk up this impotent win because it's the first time they've stepped onto the american stage and the first time they'v taken on a great fighter - albeit way past his prime.

    now compare that to hatton's come-what-may attitude in 24-7 leading up to his showdown with floyd.

    hell, calzaghe - hopkins isn't isn't going to be PPV.
     
  11. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    read my post again.

    it's not 'common knowledge', it's just what you're basing your argument on.

    read my post, tell me why i'm wrong and i'll be happy to reply to you.

    i'm daring you now...
     
  12. FRKO

    FRKO "A MAN" Full Member

    3,088
    0
    Nov 24, 2007
    It's a difficult situation for Joe. Fighters over here make more money under Warren than under any other promoter. Eubank and Benn will tell you the same thing. Warren has been a huge help to Joe when he needed it, and for that he's still very loyal to him. When Joe managed to shake off Mickey Duff, do you know that Joe actually owed Mickey £20,000? Tell me that isn't disgusting situation for a fighter to be in after being an unbeaten world champion in something like 21 fights and never making a single penny out of it. You see how Warren helped Joe out of a shithole here?

    Another thing is, I don't exactly understand how the contracts work or what length of time they run for, but getting out of a contract is often an extremely difficult, painful, long drawn-out process. I know this myself having been involved as a musician in the music business and having to walk away from complex contracts and huge advances (advances being the money that you are given to make albums), because at the end of the day, some evil shark wants a big piece of you and you are in danger of making nothing yourself. So, while it may be easy for us to sit on our butts and say "Joe should have ditched Warren", it may not be quite as simple as that, especially when the guy is comfortable and earning a good living already. Let's not forget, Joe is from humble beginnings, too.

    Don King wanted Joe to come to him. he might still want him, I don't know, but I'm very glad he avoided any offers.
     
  13. FRKO

    FRKO "A MAN" Full Member

    3,088
    0
    Nov 24, 2007
    Don't "dare" me to do anything. If you want to get nasty, you need to get out of my face because I ain't getting into a slagging match with nobody. I don't need to try and prove anyone wrong, either. Either discuss this rationally or don't discuss it at all, I don't give a ****.

    BTW, you just jumped on me for a post I made to someone else. It wasn't even directed at you.
     
  14. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    the issue isn't money - it's respect.

    and because joe wanted to call out both jones and hopkins at that time - well that's why he cheapens him to be honest.

    he aint stupid.
     
  15. BADINTENTIONS2

    BADINTENTIONS2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,073
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    i'm not trying to get nasty. i'm 'daring' you to read my original post and react to it.