Money losing would be much more of a shock than Tyson losing to Douglas IMO

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MVC, Apr 30, 2012.


  1. MVC

    MVC Boxing Junkie banned

    12,389
    7
    Mar 5, 2012
    I couldn't possibly bear it, I'd find the nearest bridge and jump right off it.
     
  2. Cellz831

    Cellz831 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,344
    3
    Oct 21, 2011
    yes, because he has the media and more haters praying on his downfall, talks more **** and the best in the sport. would be bigger than Jones losing to tarver and tyson losing to douglas combined.

    thats why he trains so hard.
     
  3. valleyfightfan

    valleyfightfan Member Full Member

    156
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    In terms of shock, nothing can top Tyson/Douglas. Anyone who was around back then(22 years ago) can't forget how HUGE of a shock that was.
     
  4. willcross

    willcross Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,413
    739
    Jun 11, 2006
    Even if Floyd had lost to Baldomir it wouldn't have been as huge.
     
  5. randomwalk

    randomwalk Active Member Full Member

    1,035
    0
    Feb 25, 2010
    42-1 vs 6-1. No. Just shows how delusional you are.
     
  6. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    4
    Jul 19, 2004

    It's very doubtful you weren't even born when that fight happened ******. And no doubt you even know the odd for each, and just how unbeatable Tyson was then. Just do everyone a favor, do it now..
     
  7. vonBanditos

    vonBanditos M΃derator Full Member

    2,577
    4
    Jul 19, 2004
    It wouldn't be THAT shocking. It just shows that it matters to you. Every man can be beaten. You never know how styles may clash until they actually get into the ring.
     
  8. dcb154

    dcb154 Member Full Member

    269
    81
    Jul 24, 2008
    Exactly! Everyone has their revisionist history (same with the perception of Roy Jones' career), but at the time, nothing tops Douglas upsetting Tyson. They see the old, mellow fatter Tyson, and apply that vision to the 80s/early 90s.
     
  9. bronx

    bronx Boxing Junkie banned

    12,190
    0
    Dec 26, 2007
    Bull**** Cotto is way better than Buster and Tyson ain't as good as Floyd
     
  10. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    9
    Jul 25, 2008
    No way!! Nothing compares to that bro. were talking about Cotto, a guy that really only has 1 lost and has been whooping ass for years.
     
  11. willcross

    willcross Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,413
    739
    Jun 11, 2006
    A closer comparison would be Carlos Maussa outboxing Floyd to a UD.
     
  12. timagen

    timagen Guest

    And that's why I love the guy, and you really put it so precisely; for me at that time, that it seemed profound.


    Disclaimer: I'm high.
     
  13. box101

    box101 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,088
    1
    Dec 19, 2009
    not realy miguel a much more accoplished fighter at this point in his career than buster ever was
     
  14. RobertV77

    RobertV77 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,001
    4
    Apr 7, 2010
    Well, hind sight is 20 20 right? At the time no one was expecting Tyson to lose. It was such a big upset Don King thought he could get the whole thing over turned after the fact, and alot people were buying into that ****. They couldn't believe it after watching it with their own eyes.
     
  15. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    lol :lol:

    half of the *****s on this board would follow suit. imagine a "shot" and "damaged goods" (*****s own words before) cotto beating floyd.