Pacquiao Bradley Face Off preview

Again, brilliant reading comprehension. I said that fighters who rank below the #1 to beat him often prove their greatness during these fights, as underdogs, not before; hence, it's perfectly reasonable to think fighter A has accomplished more in their division than fighter B, but that the style and timing of the match-up favors fighter B.

 

Oh really so bradley now has the style to beat pac. Great observation.

Fact is pac can't be considered your p4p number 1 then you pick someone of bradley skillset to beat him, **** is ******ed. If you don't consider pac your number 1 fighter then feel free to pick bradley to whoop his ass.:deal

 

Yu Da MAN

 

For that last time. Read carefully now.

1. I do not favor Bradley to beat Pacquiao. This is not about that.

2. You can consider fighter A more accomplished and more deserving of a #1 Pound-For-Pound ranking than fighter B, and still pick B, a less proven fighter, to beat him.

Can you comprehend that? Can you finally understand that rankings are based on the PAST, not the HYPOTHETICAL FUTURE?

 

:thumbsup

 

I think what these lot are trying to say is Pacquiao deserves his spot at number 1/2 in the P4P list due to his achievements and activity in the ring, which is true.

However there are fighters such as Bradley who haven't yet accomplished everything to be recognised as one of the top P4P fighters however they have what it takes to defeat one of the guys at the top, which will the road Bradley or any other fighter will have to take in order to cement their place as one of the world's top P4P fighters.

But this isn't the point, the point is that Bradley is gonna win that fight and all the *******s are going to be put to rest :good

 

People told me how stupid you were, I really did give you every chance. :-(

 

Noone told you, stop hyping you ****.

 

You can pick whoever you like, but your criteria behind that assumption,nine times out of ten will be ******ed. Especially when it is a lesser guy coming up in weight to fight you.

I have no problem people picking bradley to beat pac, I suggest those people don't have pac as their current p4p number 1, which makes sense.

 

A guy from essex calling someone stupid

 

Well that's different; I get that, but it is possible in some cases, and it would still be rational. In any case I don't see Bradley beating Pacquiao.

 

Why don't we flip the equation then. Let's take floyd mayweather our current p4p number 1 fighter. Who besides pac 147 and below could you favour to beat the p4p number 1 fighter in the world. Hand on heart I couldn't pick anyone to do that. This doesn't mean that he can't lose just that I couldn't pick anyone to be the man to do it.

And this is why I believe people who pick the likes of bradley to beat pac can't possibly have pac as their current p4p number 1. This is all i was trying to say.

 

:rofl:roflatsch