Why winner take all, and % bets are stupid

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Round1gymDC, May 13, 2012.


  1. Round1gymDC

    Round1gymDC Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    3
    Dec 12, 2009
    The winner take all thing or the winner takes the bigger percentage thing is stupid. In a world where we have so many bad decisions you are asking these guys to let the judges decided their pay?

    Another thing is that you are setting the sport up for more corruption. I could just imagine how many people will be on both sides payroll to make sure that eveybody, and everything in the arena is in their favor. From security guards to waitresses they will all be offered a piece if their fighter wins. The elevator host may put anthrax in your luggage. This would be like Goodfellas 2012. Real dumb idea.
     
  2. JoeyP

    JoeyP Member Full Member

    378
    1
    Aug 12, 2004
    It's already that bad isn't it?

    How about only apply that IF there is a KO?
     
  3. PivotPunch

    PivotPunch Guest

    That would favor some fighters. There would be nothing to gain for Mayweather it´s highly unlikely that he could Ko Manny
     
  4. xizor

    xizor Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,346
    1
    Oct 25, 2010
    This is a bit dramatic. But entertaining none the less. For the most part I agree.