Would you rank Carl Froch higher than Naseem Hamed?

Is this a trick question? I actually think Hamed gets under-rated a little but Froch has clearly surpassed him.

 

Afcoarse !! dont ask silly questions the only elite guy Nas fought was barerra and he lost.

 

Seriously? Come on man, Froch surpassed Naz a couple years back. Carl has fought literally every elite fighter in his division, and even called out undefeated P4P Calzaghe time and time again with no answer. As of right now I believe he has THE BEST resume in the entire sport. And for his murderer's row of opponents of the last few years he only has 2 loses with one of them being questionable imo. Are you really pondering this?

 

This content is protected

 

Is S.O.G. as to Froch what M.A.B. was to Hamed?

 

Froch calls ward boring because he got schooled. I don't respect that ****.

 

Froch decisively lost to Ward.

Froch decisively lost to (past his prime) Kessler.

Froch decisively lost to Dirrell but got lucky on the cards.

Hamed was a phenom that decided to enjoy life once he met opposition.
That puts Froch ahead of him as far as achievements, but not talent-wise.

 

Naz can't hold a candle to Froch in terms of achievements.

But he was a very entertaining fighter.

 

Naz isnt fit to hold Froch's spit bucket.

 

:---( Damn. I didn't know split decisions were decisive.atsch

 

No he calls Ward boring because Ward is actually boring. If he was exciting, he would have had an actual fanbase, which he hasn't.

Dude, we get you.

And I didn't know wins were decisive losses too. :huh

 

Watch the fight. :deal

 

Absolutely. How many epic underdog wins did Naz have? The first fighter he stepped up against he lost to and vanished.

 

similar to Duran saying Benitez and Leonard were boring after they beat him easily.