The stage is set.... Dirrell vs Carl Froch 2

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hussleman, May 27, 2012.


  1. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    Ok, this long await rematch needs to happen. Good win last night Froch but don't duck Dirrell.
     
  2. |A|C|S|

    |A|C|S| Boxing Junkie banned

    12,964
    0
    Mar 7, 2012
    Although i think Dirrell would win why would Froch take it when he could fight Kessler or Ward for a bigger payday, his promoter would have to be an idiot to put him in with Dirrell now (true say his promoter jumped in the ring before the fight finished and coulda got Froch dq`d) so wouldnt rule it out 100% lol
     
  3. tito44

    tito44 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,585
    6
    Oct 25, 2009
    He is not going to fight Direll. Why would he? Kessler is next. Not only did Kessler actually beat him, he would get probably 10x as much in money, literally.
     
  4. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    That fight isn't happening. It doesn't make any sense for Froch at this time to rematch Dirrell.
     
  5. Lilo

    Lilo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,947
    2
    Jul 6, 2010
    Dirrell hasn't beaten anyone of note for over two years.

    He isn't relevant right now.

    Froch v Kessler is a better fight, makes Froch more money, would get more credit for doing it, legacy enhancing AND the way Kessler was against Green, I'd say its an more winnable fight for him.
     
  6. Requiem4Hvywht

    Requiem4Hvywht Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,816
    1
    Feb 6, 2010
    Why in the world would FROCH choose to fight dirrel who has become a complete nobody in the sport. When dirrel chose to fake his injury and pull out of the super 6 he completely stalled his career. How would it serve FROCH to fight a non champion and someone who is not even highly regarded?
     
  7. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    24
    Jul 28, 2008
    :good
     
  8. papadoc28

    papadoc28 Boxing Addict banned

    4,623
    1
    Feb 17, 2010
    Pick your poison.........
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected


    Dirrell for the win! Just too much slickness.
     
  9. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Unless there's another hometown decision, Dirrell is still too slick and too black for Carl Froch :deal
     
  10. richard mossley

    richard mossley Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,101
    1
    May 7, 2009
    Why does anyone want to See Andrea again when we can have Froch Kessler?

    I would rather take a war with Kessler than see Andrea on his arse 15 times in 12 rds. He went down 3 times in rd 6. Nobody wants to see this again.
     
  11. tito44

    tito44 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,585
    6
    Oct 25, 2009
    :lol:
     
  12. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    :nod
     
  13. Vergilius

    Vergilius Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,220
    3
    May 29, 2010
    Won't happen. First fight wasn't very good and not many people would pay to watch the rematch. If Dirrell wants a title shot, he has to be more active and get himself back in contention.
     
  14. Slider75

    Slider75 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,113
    3
    Oct 19, 2008
    Honest. I dont want to see that sissy run, fall and cry again!
     
  15. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    I think Dirrell got hosed in the first fight, but he doesn't deserve ****. The irrelevancy he's currently experiencing is the well-deserved product of a series of bad decisions on his part.