The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Exactly.

    The guy has just released information on two fighters within the space of a couple of weeks. He has excellent sources, something which Longcount confirmed. For those who don't know, Longcount is an 'insider' and is often the source of information weeks before any other boxing site. He's ESB's most informed insider, by a long way.

    You don't go from having excellent information to making up a bull**** story in the space of a few weeks. Montoya is on to something big, whether it involves Floyd or not.
     
  2. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    that really proves nothing. could it be that the usada tested fighters are/were clean and the vada tested fighters were dirty? gabe himself is stating that he feels in both circumstances where the fighters tested positive that he felt they weren't actually trying to cheat.

    things to consider....

    conte is an advisor for vada.

    conte was assisting berto...one of the fighters who tested positive.

    gabe has done a great amount of research on all of this. he deserves plenty of credit for educating the public on it. i'm guessing...i don't know for sure...but...

    has a good portion of gabes understanding of all of this come from conte?

    does conte stand to gain anything by making vada the standard for all of testing?

    could berto have been a sacrificial lamb to forward a possible agenda?
     
  3. PrinceN

    PrinceN Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,987
    2
    Jul 24, 2011
    they dont even make threads about Bradly vs Manny. Remember when Floyd has his workout how long that thread was? Manny's workout had like 3 pages they hate Floyd so much now they dont even pay attention to Manny
     
  4. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    bump.. still see people claiming Floyds fans are against it.. Yet NONE are responding to this.. Who are all these people against it? Seems like everyone in this thread has said they don't care who does the testing and aren't against Floyd's people releasing documents to the proper people.
     
  5. Dillyyo

    Dillyyo Active Member Full Member

    1,100
    0
    May 29, 2012

    Listen, there is nothing wrong with VADA and they are supposedly cheaper, though I wonder if they are adequately prepared to deal with any potential suits for erroneous reports of positive results. Other than that it's run by legitimate people. But, to sit here and **** on USADA and act like they are second rate is nonsense.

    As far as public disclosure tell me how much you hear about NFL, MLB or NBA players getting popped? If anything you hear they got popped for something and usually not what it is. Reason is because people have confidentiality rights and unless boxing gets one unifying body, no one is going to force another to divulge.

    People should put as much emphasis and enthusiasm into calling out the corrupt figures in boxing as they do PEDs. Conte is likely looking to make money since he knows he can't make it off off what he really believes...PEDSs should be legal and Gabe is riding a wave and likely trying desperately to counter that inferiority complex he grew up with in life.
     
  6. MetalLicker

    MetalLicker I Am Full Member

    23,632
    26,629
    Feb 10, 2011
    I see some people are quaking in fear.

    Why are Floyd fans trying to shut this man up when he's the guy who broke the story about Peterson & Berto testing positive?

    He knows something, and Floyd fans are scared sh*tless about what he can reveal.
     
  7. meh...

    meh... New Member Full Member

    82
    0
    May 29, 2012
  8. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    other things to consider....

    mayweather getting physical with gabe....

    i'm not justifying floyd poking gabes chest...but could that have anything to do with his association with maxboxing? maxboxing has been a notorious mayweather basher since the days of doug fisher. maxboxing has also been highly critical of anything al haymon.
     
  9. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    An ad hominem argument against a writer who has helped break the two biggest doping stories in the sport in recent years . . .

    You're cool :good
     
  10. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,867
    34,854
    Jun 23, 2005
    No **** people like lance are the worst. Never had a problem with current lax testing for Pac but now all of a sudden are serious about it as long as it's only about pbf.
     
  11. Whipdatass

    Whipdatass Boxing Junkie banned

    9,353
    2
    Aug 18, 2011
    Just let the PED professionals blow hit air. They suffered for years hearing Floyds fans.call Pacquiao a cheat. Let these googling arm chair psychologists lay down their revenge, lmao.
     
  12. Whipdatass

    Whipdatass Boxing Junkie banned

    9,353
    2
    Aug 18, 2011
    Eat a dick you clueless, fat, green teeth having degenerate.
     
  13. Divi253

    Divi253 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,939
    4
    Apr 1, 2010
    Who's against this information being released? This thread keeps growing, you all keep saying Floyds fans are against this, yet none are being named or on this thread? Where are all the people against it?
     
  14. Dee

    Dee Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,217
    3
    May 21, 2011

    Indeed - But you'd think Floyd would have learned by now :think

    I.e. His Prison Sentence.
     
  15. Dillyyo

    Dillyyo Active Member Full Member

    1,100
    0
    May 29, 2012
    Stop being silly. There is an assumption based on the fact that CIR testing is a ratio test and does not clearly show that the ratio is due to outside or exogenous test in the system. Even when it shows positive it still can't say whether it came from intended use or environmental factors...you have to take a leap of faith and assume the ratio is because of use.

    When you do qualitative HPLC or GC testing you are looking for an identifiable marker that indicates what something is...no assumptions needed.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.