This was not a robbery; it was a close fight that could of gone either way.

I guess landing much fewer punches and power punches do deserve to win the fight, right?

your argument is funny as hell

 

**** off noob. Compubox doesn't mean ****. Fights are scored round by round. Pacquiao did very little work over the last 6 rounds, took his foot off the gas and he paid the price.

 

argument goes both ways, if pac landed less than what Compubox indicated, so did Bradley, which would relegate his punch output close to ZERO.

 

Mosley sure didn't make Pacquiao look good. Neither did Clottey. They still lost badly though. It's the same thing with Bradley.

And if Bradley actually was hitting Pacquiao cleanly and consistently, more often than Pacquiao was hitting him cleanly and consistently, I'd say he deserved to win. But guess what? He didn't. I mentioned in my post that I felt Abril beat Rios. ****, I scored that fight 10-2 Abril. He's featherfisted, but he still hit Rios cleanly far often than the reverse. That's why he won in my book. I'm not saying Bradley didn't deserve to win the fight because he's featherfisted; he didn't deserve that BS decision because the quality of his work was inferior to what Pacquiao did.

 

******, If you can count, Pacman outpunched Bradley in 10 of 12 rounds. If Pac didn't do much, that means Bradley did even less.

 

Bradley won the fight.

 

It means that if you lose 7-8 rounds in a fight without KDs and point deductions you lose it. Try to save some credibility. You don't like Pac you don't have to, but try to score the fights more or less objectively. Bradley was hurt in almost any of the rounds. He was also out-punched and he never hurt Pac. If you are Bradley mother you can give him four rounds and that's it.

 

Bradley beat pacquiao with a broken ankle this is why he had no power or snap in his punches maybe pacquiao was lucky tonight he didn't fight a fully fit Bradley

 

NO way Bradley won that fight. Again, I'm a fan who had Marquez beat Pacquiao in all three fights. This was an outright robbery. Two wrongs don't make a right. Manny won each round by landing the more effective punches which moved Bradley. This isn't a case where the underdog outboxed the other with superior generalship; two rounds for Bradley would have been generous. Ridiculous robbery. The way Arum hugged Bradley said it all; he was investing in a future star. Disgusting. **** Arum.

 

you mean the ankle that he turned after being twisted by a Pac headshot? LOL. And while you at the game of exaggeration, why don't we have Bradley fighting with a punctured lung and late-stage prostate cancer.

 

Tim won 3-4 rounds at a stretch...the decision was a bit of a shock tbh. I thought if anyone was gonna get a gift it would be Manny not Timmy. Oh well, May/Pac is now confirmed to never happen.

Thanks Arum you ****.

 

At the same time maybe we are losing our time. A lot of people will troll now just to get the *******s mad . If you have scored the fight for Bradley it means that you don't know **** about boxing. It's not up for discussion. It is not Clottey-Cotto or Pac-JMM 1.

 

120-108 Pac, there was no round where Bradley had cleaner or more effective punches landed than Pac.

 

I remember going into the 11th round, telling everybody who was at my cousins house watching, that the fight could be close on the scorecards. Bradley's footwork was pretty impressive in 2nd half of fight and he seemed to have had Manny frustrated after the 8th.

Regardless of who won, Manny has not looked good 3 fights in a row.

 

I thought Manny looked way better than expected. A lot of pundits and fans were a little down on him before the fight. But this fight was one of the easiest fights in the last 10 years for pacman