Pacquiao looked terrible again. Lucky Bradley has no power

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MichiganWarrior, Jun 10, 2012.


  1. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Bradley figured Pacquiao out in championship rounds. The HBO panel was hilariously biased per usual.

    Had Pacquiao winning 8-4/7-5. Wasnt shocked when scorecards were announced.

    Suffice to say when you give Pac movement he looks painfully ordinary. Interested in the rematch. Bradley was never outclassed. Infact he made Pac miss the majority of his punches. And his jab kept Pac on his heels the entire night. Bradley is very weak offensively, no power and doesnt have an authoritative punch. He just outworks his opponents.

    Welp, Mayweather p4p number 1. Rightfully so. Pacquiao abilities diminish substantially when faced with an versatile opponent he just cant overpower
     
  2. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    706
    Dec 8, 2009
    What are you talking about , Manny floored Bradley at least two possibly three times.
     
  3. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    it's common knowledge that pac always had a hard time with counter-punches but still finds himself a way through sheer will, determination and athleticism. Pac has clearly declined now... and even so he still put a young hungry undefeated champion in his place.

    pac has made his mark in boxing... he's still good but not as great as he was. bob just trying to cash in.
     
  4. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,128
    Oct 17, 2009
    Bradley didn't have the movement, offense, and experience necessary to successfully time and counter Pacquiao. His counters came too late, and his leads were thrown out of position. Manny got his lead foot on the outside all night, and ducked most of what Timmy threw at him. Even with power, he was no match technically. This may contradict the world of ***** logic in which any competent technician can out-box Manny, but the point stands; Bradley was not skilled enough to win even 4 rounds. And again, that comes from someone who had Marquez winning all 3 of their fights, the 3rd one comfortably.
     
  5. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Tim was shook maybe once at most. Around round 9 tim was ducking the left and come with the counter hook. Was tagging Pacquiao.

    Cant wait for rematch. Pacquiaos a ******, bradley will improve.

    Oh n if comes out the Bradley beat pac on bad ankle lol
     
  6. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Your biased towards Latinos. Figures.


    If you cant admit Pac was having the same trouble finding Bradley as he did Marquez, nor admit that Bradley won the championship rounds get the **** off my thread.

    The HBO team post fight said they review 8 scorecards and the all had Bradley winning the Champ rounds cept one. **** off ******.
     
  7. platnumpapi

    platnumpapi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,212
    4
    Jun 10, 2005
    he looked the same to me just did not fighting passed prime margarito after a yr off at 150.

    he looked the same to me just did not fight cotto at 145.

    he looked the same to me just not fighting a club fighter like ricky hatton.

    he looked the same to me just not fighting a passed prime mosley.

    pacman fought complete fighter in his prime with a slick style and thats what happend. look like the same pacman to me, he had the speed and power. he let his hands go and he did what he could.same pacman same style in there with a different caliber of fighter.
     
  8. king khan

    king khan Boxing Junkie banned

    10,733
    0
    Apr 9, 2012
    Pacquiao looked good. . . bradley is just pretty damn good himself. . .

    Pacquiao dominated, and beat down an undefeated, young, primed boxer. . .

    Pac actually used his jab as more of a point scorer/damage inflictor this time.
     
  9. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,128
    Oct 17, 2009
    Biased towards Latinos? Way to pull that one out of your ass.

    You are a proven die-hard ***** who underrates Pac at every chance and never put on a pair of gloves. Pacquiao won that fight clear and won a vast majority of rounds by being the more skilled fighter. If you can't agree to that then shut the **** up cuz you don't know **** about boxing.
     
  10. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    :lol: Bradley barely had a mark on his face. Compubox was atrocious.
     
  11. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    "no he's not the same" - stevie wonder
     
  12. LordJomski

    LordJomski Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,926
    0
    May 17, 2011
    Hey Bogotazo, I'd like to know your thoughts on Broner-Ponce? and Rios-Abril? :smoke
     
  13. theDUD3

    theDUD3 Active Member Full Member

    897
    0
    Mar 4, 2006
    This content is protected


    who missed who and whose jab what?
     
  14. Ringnut

    Ringnut Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,009
    2
    May 1, 2009
    Hey man, does Golpe a Golpe have post fight analysis on their show? I am honestly very curious about what JMM feels about this decision.
     
  15. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Pacquiao looked like **** against a 140lber whos best opponent to that point was Lamont Peterson, an im underrating him.:rofl

    Top it off Bradley had a busted ankle.


    Again Rico Suave explain why most ringside observers had Tim nearly sweeping the championship rounds.