Worse robbery Pacquiao-JMM III or Pac-Bradley?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Indio-Bandido, Jun 10, 2012.


  1. JabCross727

    JabCross727 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,912
    124
    Jun 14, 2008
    Robbery is when one guy clearly won the fight, was clearly more competitive than the other guy, and was no doubt to have his hand raise.

    Pac-JMM III was competitive so you can't really say it was a robbery per se. But Pac-Bradley is what they would call in law "Res ipsa loquitur" = The thing speaks for itself.

    Pac was winning anywhere from 9-11 rounds. But how he only got 5 rounds on two of the scorecards? Can't explain it...which makes it a robbery.

    Just being objectively speaking.
     
  2. Whiskers

    Whiskers Member Full Member

    208
    0
    May 2, 2012
    Pacquiao vs Bradley was worse. At least with the Marquez fight most of the rounds were close. But Bradley didnt mount anything effective. He was tamed all night pretty much. Pacquiao handled him better than he handled Cotto in some ways (in the early rounds).
     
  3. |A|C|S|

    |A|C|S| Boxing Junkie banned

    12,964
    0
    Mar 7, 2012
    Wouldn't go that far...
     
  4. RSBonos

    RSBonos Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,436
    141
    Feb 27, 2008
    Marquez III was a close fight with a clear winner as Marquez should have won by 2-3 rounds.

    Last night was a whitewash, Bradley did slightly better then Mosley did against Pac.
     
  5. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,635
    18,358
    Oct 7, 2006
    Last nights fight was close, the HBO commentating was a disgrace.

    JMM-Pac III HBO commentating was disgraceful too, but the fight was clearly without a shred of doubt Marquez'.
     
  6. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    I had both 7-5 for the loser for each fight, easily 6-6
     
  7. Doc

    Doc Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,915
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    You forgot the terms...

    SAME!
     
  8. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011
    Pacquiao vs Bradley.
     
  9. kordapio

    kordapio Member Full Member

    464
    0
    May 5, 2012
    Pac-Bradley and it is not even close, exponentially!!
     
  10. WarMaidana

    WarMaidana Member Full Member

    138
    0
    Sep 24, 2011
    definately last night whoever thinks pac-marquez 3 was soem huge robbery is retarted. It was a close fight where the decision could of went to either fighter, but last night was an easy winb for pac
     
  11. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,285
    6
    Jul 26, 2008
    Pac-JMM was a close fight, most of the rounds could have gone either way, but JMM deserved it.


    Pac-Timmeh was a disgrace, some of the close rounds was still favored to Pac, and pac deserved it.
     
  12. listen, cousin, i understand that you're not really a Pacquiao fan, but to say that last night's fight was close is just plain dumb. it wasnt close at all. pacquiao completely dominated bradley. he outclassed him and exposed bradley for what he really is: a b level fighter with superb conditioning.
     
  13. bloomstombs

    bloomstombs Member Full Member

    204
    0
    May 5, 2012
    I thought Pac Marq 3 was bad, but this is far worse. Just mo.
     
  14. rorschach51

    rorschach51 A Legend & A Gentleman Full Member

    12,195
    8,408
    Feb 18, 2012
    I didn't vote because last night was a close fight that could have gone either way. The worse robbery was Whitaker vs Chavez. Draw!!! :patsch:fire
     
  15. SweetHome_Bama

    SweetHome_Bama Loyal Member banned

    32,270
    3
    Apr 30, 2010
    JMM-Manny was a actual robbery. Rios/abril was a robbery.

    Manny - Bradley was a scored correctly.