Many people got mad with that bad decision last weekend but...

No *****! Manny win that one clear 117-111. No robbery there *****.

 

Plenty of people were mad about the Marquez fight.

The Marquez fight was also a CLOSE fight( one i think JMM won) where as the Bradley fight wasn't close what so ever.

If Bradley beat Pac, then Cotto destroyed Mayweather.

 

Yep. Strange thread.

 

Their guy didn't get ****ed in that one- The other guy did. Simple as that.

 

I don't think the Bradley and Marquez fights are good comparisons. One was super close and the other was not IMO.

 

This content is protected

 

The thing is though.. Even Marquez himself admits he lost the fight but just barely

Here is proof

[url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/member.php?u=91375[/url]

 

Maybe, because that wasn't a robbery.

Regardless of who you felt won.

 

As a Pac fan, I was a little embarassed at the JMM III result, but it was a close fight in which the guy I was rooting for won, so why would I be mad?

 

Seriously...

Cotto/Mayweather was much more competitive than Pacquiao/Bradley was.

 

Manny win both ***** now deal with it *****!

 

Your hero lost *****, lmao. ****ing cry baby, lmao.

 

Tell me something, what was the most outrageous scorecard that the heaters came up with Pac-JMM 3? 8-4.
The more unbiased fans had it at anything in between 115-113 for JMM, a draw or 115-113 Pac.
First time I watched it (live on TV) I had it at 115-113 Pac, watched it again and ended in a draw, watched it again favoring JMM's clean punching and ring generalship more and ended at 115-113 JMM. Watched it again favoring Pac's short punches, defense and countering and ended with 115-113 Pac.

It was a close fight. Sway your criteria a bit and you can score some rounds to the other fighter.

Now tell me, what is the most outrageous score that you can give Bradley last night?
That will be 8-4 STILL FAVORING Pac.
The only rounds that you may give to Bradley in good conscience are rounds 2, 7, 10 and 12.
If you know how both Pac and Bradley fight, you will understand that the only time that Bradley imposed his will and realistically "controlled" the fight is round 10. The rest were all VERY CLEARLY Pac rounds.

Even 115-113 in favor of Pac is alredy a robbery in itself. THIS WHAT MADE THIS FIGHT AN OBVIOUSLY WORSE DECISION.

You think boxing got a better name by "avenging JMM's loss" by creating two bad decisions, this time even worse than the former, at the highest level of the sport?
You are all ******s who got more ******ed when Floyd went to jail.:bart

 

If you value democracy you'll admit that a bad decision never washes another bad decision. It's as simple as 1+1. Bad decision + Bad decision = 2 Bad decisions. Nothing more, nothing less. To use the word fair here would be an abomination.
... I'm no fan of Pacquiao.