Many people got mad with that bad decision last weekend but...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Nopporn, Jun 10, 2012.

Page 1 of 2
  1. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Messages:
    9,268
    Likes Received:
    1,741
    Why didn't they get mad when JMM got robbed in the third match against Pacquiao?
     
    Nopporn, Jun 10, 2012
    #1
  2. Mrpacman

    Mrpacman Guest

    No *****! Manny win that one clear 117-111. No robbery there *****.
     
    Mrpacman, Jun 10, 2012
    #2
  3. Medicine

    Medicine Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    4,277
    Likes Received:
    4
    Plenty of people were mad about the Marquez fight.

    The Marquez fight was also a CLOSE fight( one i think JMM won) where as the Bradley fight wasn't close what so ever.

    If Bradley beat Pac, then Cotto destroyed Mayweather.
     
    Medicine, Jun 10, 2012
    #3
  4. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    38,201
    Likes Received:
    2,602
    Yep. Strange thread.
     
    Ilesey, Jun 10, 2012
    #4
  5. JMM's Pee Pee

    JMM's Pee Pee God Damn! Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,646
    Likes Received:
    0
    Their guy didn't get ****ed in that one- The other guy did. Simple as that.
     
    JMM's Pee Pee, Jun 10, 2012
    #5
  6. TJay

    TJay Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2012
    Messages:
    432
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think the Bradley and Marquez fights are good comparisons. One was super close and the other was not IMO.
     
    TJay, Jun 10, 2012
    #6
  7. MVC

    MVC Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2012
    Messages:
    12,389
    Likes Received:
    7
    This content is protected
     
    MVC, Jun 10, 2012
    #7
  8. TaylorSwift12

    TaylorSwift12 Guest

    The thing is though.. Even Marquez himself admits he lost the fight but just barely

    Here is proof

    [url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/member.php?u=91375[/url]
     
    TaylorSwift12, Jun 10, 2012
    #8
  9. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    38,511
    Likes Received:
    13,319
    Maybe, because that wasn't a robbery.

    Regardless of who you felt won.
     
    cuchulain, Jun 10, 2012
    #9
  10. mrtony80

    mrtony80 Likes thick chicks Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,114
    Likes Received:
    391
    As a Pac fan, I was a little embarassed at the JMM III result, but it was a close fight in which the guy I was rooting for won, so why would I be mad?
     
    mrtony80, Jun 10, 2012
    #10
  11. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Messages:
    38,291
    Likes Received:
    23
    Seriously...

    Cotto/Mayweather was much more competitive than Pacquiao/Bradley was.
     
    Boom_Boom, Jun 10, 2012
    #11
  12. Mrpacman

    Mrpacman Guest

    Manny win both ***** now deal with it *****!
     
    Mrpacman, Jun 10, 2012
    #12
  13. Whipdatass

    Whipdatass Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2011
    Messages:
    9,353
    Likes Received:
    2
    Your hero lost *****, lmao. ****ing cry baby, lmao.
     
    Whipdatass, Jun 10, 2012
    #13
  14. this_and_that

    this_and_that Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    5,697
    Likes Received:
    351
    Tell me something, what was the most outrageous scorecard that the heaters came up with Pac-JMM 3? 8-4.
    The more unbiased fans had it at anything in between 115-113 for JMM, a draw or 115-113 Pac.
    First time I watched it (live on TV) I had it at 115-113 Pac, watched it again and ended in a draw, watched it again favoring JMM's clean punching and ring generalship more and ended at 115-113 JMM. Watched it again favoring Pac's short punches, defense and countering and ended with 115-113 Pac.

    It was a close fight. Sway your criteria a bit and you can score some rounds to the other fighter.

    Now tell me, what is the most outrageous score that you can give Bradley last night?
    That will be 8-4 STILL FAVORING Pac.
    The only rounds that you may give to Bradley in good conscience are rounds 2, 7, 10 and 12.
    If you know how both Pac and Bradley fight, you will understand that the only time that Bradley imposed his will and realistically "controlled" the fight is round 10. The rest were all VERY CLEARLY Pac rounds.

    Even 115-113 in favor of Pac is alredy a robbery in itself. THIS WHAT MADE THIS FIGHT AN OBVIOUSLY WORSE DECISION.

    You think boxing got a better name by "avenging JMM's loss" by creating two bad decisions, this time even worse than the former, at the highest level of the sport?
    You are all ******s who got more ******ed when Floyd went to jail.:bart
     
    this_and_that, Jun 10, 2012
    #14
  15. Orbete

    Orbete Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you value democracy you'll admit that a bad decision never washes another bad decision. It's as simple as 1+1. Bad decision + Bad decision = 2 Bad decisions. Nothing more, nothing less. To use the word fair here would be an abomination.
    ... I'm no fan of Pacquiao.
     
    Orbete, Jun 10, 2012
    #15
Page 1 of 2