115-113 cards are reasonable for Pac-Tim and i will tell you why

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PR BOXING, Jun 12, 2012.


  1. Zombieguy

    Zombieguy Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,989
    1
    Feb 6, 2011
    Just rewatched this fight and my perspective has completely changed. Pacquiao outclassed Bradley with his superior quickness and power. He dodged all of Bradley's shots and was landing at will. He took the last few rounds off and still came out looking better in those rounds. Pac 120-108 and I might be nice to give Bradley 1-2 rounds near the end.











































    Just kidding. Bradley 116-112.
     
  2. undefeated

    undefeated FIMP Full Member

    368
    0
    Jan 24, 2005
    well that explains it, watch the fight and you will understand why that clown Bladegunner you were agreeing with earlier is a dumbass troll spewing pac hate nonsense, i think pac and floyd are both great fighters and all the ******* and ***** bull**** has flooded the esb forums with so many idiotic threads it damn near runied the site completely
     
  3. liger05

    liger05 puroresu fan 4 life!! Full Member

    4,101
    21
    Nov 11, 2008
    I scored it 116 – 112 for pacquiao. I thought Bradley won the 1st round and I gave him 10, 11 and 12.

    I think it was a bad decision as I don’t think where Bradley won 7 rounds however many of these rounds were close and Pacquiao wasn’t winning them clearly.

    For me his camp should be more concerned with the face that for the last 3 rounds pacquiao took his foot of the pedal and lost the fight because of it. That is inexcusable but I did think by 8/9 pacquiao was looking tired.

    I think it’s a disgrace that guys like Harold Ledermen can score the fight 119 -109. What fight was that guy watching? It wasn’t a complete shut out in that fashion.
     
  4. RSBonos

    RSBonos Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,436
    141
    Feb 27, 2008
    I re-watched the fight and only gave Bradley 2 rounds, although 3 or even 4 rounds max was possible (1,10,11,12). However, even those Bradley rounds were close and could have gone to Pac apart from maybe the 10th.

    ROBBERY
     
  5. punchy88

    punchy88 Member Full Member

    108
    0
    Feb 11, 2012
    This site is completely ****ed. Every boxing site is completely ****ed. I can't wait for both these ****s Manny and Mayweather to retire because they have polarized the boxing fanbase many of whom watch too much 24/7, press conferences, **** talking and spend far too little time learning about the sport.

    Almost everyone here engages in confirmation bias and cant engage in any objective and rational thought process. Buch of ****ing tards.
     
  6. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee VIP Member

    51,603
    17,147
    Mar 5, 2006
    I'm a ******* and watched the fight the next morning with the sound off and it was skybox...

    People had Pac dominating, I thought it was a closer fight and agreed with the original OP. Pac was laying some serious lefts on Timmy. It was just that Timmy took them well and he was able to finish the fight. I found that part astonishing but had no bearing on the final outcome.
     
  7. Shaun Macca

    Shaun Macca Member Full Member

    166
    0
    May 22, 2012
    i agree , i got it 115 - 113 for pac , that was watching it twice with no sound. i dont know why everyone is bitching so hard , i seen worse decisions then that. i think everyone is just bummed that there will be no pac v mayweather , and to be honest i hope there isnt cos floyd i think would win by stoppage . should of happened after pacman beat cotto.
     
  8. Ringnut

    Ringnut Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,009
    2
    May 1, 2009
    I think anything higher than 116-112 for Pac means that Pac gets credited for majority of the close rounds, so it's still possible. 115-113 for Pac or a draw is giving almost all the close rounds to Bradley.

    The problem with Bradley is that even in the rounds where Pac was either coasting or tired, Bradley wasn't really doing much either, he throws more than Pac but he doesn't land much in the way of significant punches, his body shots are the only real solid shots he landed with any sort of consistency.

    I really hate it when rounds are given for plain activity even if a lot of those shots don't land. It's the same reason P. Willy was given the decision over Martinez the 1st time around. Alexander over Kotelnik and to some degree Pac over Marquez in the 3rd fight.
     
  9. Ringnut

    Ringnut Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,009
    2
    May 1, 2009
    Yeah, watching those replays you can tell Bradley has a solid set of whiskers. He ate a lot of hard punches.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,790
    51,800
    Mar 21, 2007
    116-112 is fine, but the LA Times reported that many ringside reports "had it in the 9-3, 11-1 range." A lot of people who had the same sort of view as the judges had it that wide. Are you saying that all these writers are biased? Because that doesn't seem sensible to me. Furthermore, a fight can look different to ringsiders than people watching on TV.

    Were you there? For people who were there there are only four scorecards I've seen for Bradley, and two of those were by judges.

    I think 116-112 is fine. I think it's pretty clear that something wider is fine too. 115-113 for Bradley is NOT fine.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,790
    51,800
    Mar 21, 2007
    Agree. I had it 8-4 the first time and 9-3 the second time.
     
  12. undefeated

    undefeated FIMP Full Member

    368
    0
    Jan 24, 2005
    I think it is more likely that pac v mayweather will happen now, this is exactly what floyd wanted, he always waits till his opponent looks soft and beatable
     
  13. PR BOXING

    PR BOXING Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,669
    12
    Feb 4, 2010
    how can you say that when this miguel cotto was beast, maybe the best cotto since the mosley fight
     
  14. PR BOXING

    PR BOXING Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,669
    12
    Feb 4, 2010
    what's your scorecard big boy
     
  15. PR BOXING

    PR BOXING Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,669
    12
    Feb 4, 2010
    oh man , that's trolling hard:nut