More worthless rematch Bute vs Froch 2? or Pac vs Bradley 2 (poll)

Bute got dominated and stopped early, pac/bradley was a highly disputed decision. I want neither, but a Bute-froch rematch would be another massacre

 

Since Bute was utterly dominated and rescued for his own good,I don't really think this is up for debate.

 

Bute vs Froch by far.

 

Bute and froch is a more pointless rematch as no one wants to see bute get dominated again. However, who wants to pay more money for pac man and bradley? The debate carries on but there's no way bradley realistly won and more to the point it wasnt that interesting a fight

 

Bradley deserves a rematch, Bradley more to prove himself. I believe Bradley would fair better in a rematch. Pac should probably avoid Bradley and move to more money fights, no need for him to revisit the fight.

 

I don't want to see either.

Better are:

1. Pacquiao, in a farewell, versus Canelo Alvarez in Mexico
2. Froch versus Kessler II
3. Bradley versus Khan
4. Bute versus nobody

 

Froch vs Bute is not even comparable to Pac-Bradley. Froch knocked Bute the **** out; Pac-Bradley was a close fight without even a knockdown.

Furthermore, you're a ****ing idiot for even making this thread.

 

I don't consider either of them worthless.

 

The best fighters come back from defeats. Although I don't think he will win, Bute deserves the chance.

 

I'll watch both, IF they make 'em im watching.

 

Bute v Froch by a mile. There is nothing at all in any way shape or form remotely disputable about the first fight to want to see a second.

Boxed Ears... that Avy is ****ing awesome

 

the better question is, what fight actually merits a rematch? a thorough, potentially career ending hiding, or a robbery?

 

Easily bute vs froch, pac didnt destroy tim like froch did to bute, he just won the fight.

 

Agree with everything but that.

If Pacquiao is gonna fight a Mexican in Mexico it has to be Marquez no doubt.