[url]http://ringtv.craveonline.com/blog/173305-ring-ratings-update-pacquiao-loss-what-pacquiao-loss[/url] I'm willing to bet my life that if Floyd was the one at the end of a bad decision that they wouldn't hesitate to drop him down to move Pac to #1. Dumbass Doug Fischer would happily be leading that charge. Oh yeah, this is a big shocker. I've been saying the Ring has had it in for Floyd for a awhile and this just proves my point. Case rested. Dual #2? When the hell has that ever happened? Let me think. NEVER!
Wrong forum chum. Almost nobody in Classic gives a **** about the percieved injustices perpetrated against the flashy wife-beating racist bully jailbird hero of yours, most of which only exist in your head.
I definitely don't give a rat's ass. The OP just took a wrong turn at the corner of Classic Blvd. and General Rd. He's lost.
rumor is Ring moving Floyd to the 1 spot. Based on their last 2 performances, Floyd would beat on Manny like he beat on Genaro (RIP).
This crybaby fest is getting out of hand. Seriously. Bradley deserves some kudos. Pac didn't "dominate" ****, didn't even dominate a guy who sprained his ankle.
Did you read the article? The Ring is leaving things as they are and only moving Bradley into the welterweight ratings.
Nah.....if Floyd got robbed as badly as PAC, the Ring would do the right thing for sure. there would be an even BIGGER uproar if it was Floyd who was robbed last weekend instead of PAC...Why? Simple....Everyone knows Floyd is undefeated...PAC has lost a few times already. The lone blemish on an otherwise unblemished career would be A HUGE story and would get the attention of the "powers that be"....same with PAC....this robbery has gotten A LOT of attention.
The problem with The Ring is lack of consistency. They didn't drop Pacquiao after the Marquez fight even though he didn't look good and most people thought he lost, against a guy he was a 9/1 favorite against. Their reasoning was that Pacquiao got the official decision. Now Pacquiao doesn't get the official decision, even though almost everyon thought he won, and they decide to ignore the official result.
It was an unpopular decision but it wasn't a robbery. If that were the case they would have had to change the P4P ranks on ALL close fights. There were still a good amount of people who thought PAC won and even more who called the fight a draw. NO ONE really gives Tim any credit for the win. There's a massive difference between the two fights and "official" decision in each one.
Whenever a great champion is beat there is a mass of protest and hate to the one who beat him. Whether it was the Chavez and Whitaker fans hating on DLH or the DLH fans hating on Floyd. This surge of crybabyness is typical and the popular opinion changes when everything cools down. :deal However, *******s can rest assured Pac's problem is not in his boxing but in his head. The guy needs to find that he "wants" to be in the ring, not just walk in, ko someone, and go home to a life he prefers. A better fighter let an inferior fighter make him look ordinary.
You can try to justify it all you want, but they still blatantly went against their standards and even admitted so. I really don't get how they could ignore the decision, and act like Pacquiao didn't lose while also ranking Bradley at WW. They seem to be making it up as they go along.