Lampley is an idiot!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by The Akbar One, Jun 16, 2012.


Page 3 of 4
  1. brickfists

    brickfists The Nonpareil Full Member

    8,666
    7
    Nov 19, 2008
    clearly a pac round dont understand how there can be a debate about it.
     
    brickfists, Jun 17, 2012
    brickfists, Jun 17, 2012
    #31
  2. whirlwind

    whirlwind Active Member Full Member

    516
    0
    Mar 4, 2006
    Bradley's tickling shots constantly landing on Pacs gloves and arms won him the fight. Pac obviously didn't bring the fight to the champ Bradley and challenger Pacquiao didn't do enough to win.
     
    whirlwind, Jun 17, 2012
    whirlwind, Jun 17, 2012
    #32
  3. boxon123

    boxon123 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,040
    72
    Nov 28, 2004
    I guess this is sarcasm? Winky Wright would never win a fight under these scoring conditions .
     
    boxon123, Jun 17, 2012
    boxon123, Jun 17, 2012
    #33
  4. reptilian777

    reptilian777 Active Member Full Member

    974
    40
    Mar 8, 2008


    Lol!!!

    And all the *******s and weekend boxing warriors (celebs) would use it as evidence
     
    reptilian777, Jun 17, 2012
    reptilian777, Jun 17, 2012
    #34
  5. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    He is a very good broadcaster but not great in the knowledge of boxing and technique.
     
    MAG1965, Jun 17, 2012
    MAG1965, Jun 17, 2012
    #35
  6. Just Trouble

    Just Trouble New Member Full Member

    68
    0
    May 6, 2012
    I can forgive some boxing knowledge shortcomings on lampley's part. The guy has a genuine passion for the sport, and I love listening to him call fights.
     
    Just Trouble, Jun 17, 2012
    Just Trouble, Jun 17, 2012
    #36
  7. The Akbar One

    The Akbar One Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    15,541
    5,277
    Dec 1, 2007
    That doesn't excuse his ignorance. They showed a round that was a Bradley round, and Lampley complained, that the judges weren't Pac ball gobbling like he was doing. He then cited bogus compubox numbers for the round, which were way off, and just as corrupt as Lampley's commentary often is. That whole segment didn't make sense. They could have found a round that was really a Pac round, where maybe the compubox numbers were backed up by video of the round. Instead of picking a round where the actual video of the round, showed Lampley to be one blind idiot, and showed that CompuBox is laughable and totally the opposite of accurate. Nothing like CompuBox saying a boxer landed 27 punches in a round, and that boxer actually landing less than ten. But hey wait, CompuBox has a long history of that.
     
    The Akbar One, Jun 17, 2012
    The Akbar One, Jun 17, 2012
    #37
  8. cobra

    cobra New Member Full Member

    36
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    yes indeed
     
    cobra, Jun 17, 2012
    cobra, Jun 17, 2012
    #38
  9. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    242
    Sep 28, 2007
    When he did the now infamous "Bang!, Bang!, Bang!" call a couple fights back I was like... :lol:
    Dudes voice sounds nice on the mic calling a fight, But WTF???

    HBO bringing back the OG PRO wrestling style call to the table.
     
    Hatesrats, Jun 17, 2012
    Hatesrats, Jun 17, 2012
    #39
  10. eko718

    eko718 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,804
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    Lampley has lost a ton of credibility in my book. Somewhere along the way, he became an unprofessional Pacquiao fanboy.
     
    eko718, Jun 17, 2012
    eko718, Jun 17, 2012
    #40
  11. Vergilius

    Vergilius Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,220
    3
    May 29, 2010
    I didn't see the show, but round 7 was a clear round for Pacquiao, imo. It was competitive, but Bradley landed only 1 good shot (to the body) while the Filipino landed numerous telling blows. The fact that ALL judges scored it for Bradley despite the fact that he was largely ineffective is highly suspiscious to me.
     
    Vergilius, Jun 17, 2012
    Vergilius, Jun 17, 2012
    #41
  12. Vergilius

    Vergilius Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,220
    3
    May 29, 2010
    Have you ever considered that maybe it's YOUR knowledge which is flawed? Round 7 was competitive, but it was pretty clear that Pacquiao landed all the clean shots (save 1 to the body from Bradley). Scoring the round for Bradley on the basis of ineffective aggression is a sign of the scorer not really knowing boxing.
     
    Vergilius, Jun 17, 2012
    Vergilius, Jun 17, 2012
    #42
  13. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,870
    4,087
    May 4, 2012
    Felt bad for Tim. I like Lamps but he is a puss for almost tearing up at that "robbery" and dedicating a whole episode on it. Where was his tears when Marquez boxed Pacquiao's face off over 12 rounds, Pac knew it, we knew it, Roach knew it, but Lamps stayed on Pac's dick regardless.

    Shameless.
     
    turbotime, Jun 17, 2012
    turbotime, Jun 17, 2012
    #43
  14. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,962
    3,344
    Apr 26, 2010
    Dude you're seriously stupid as ****, an embarassment to your family...please stop.
     
    Reppin501, Jun 17, 2012
    Reppin501, Jun 17, 2012
    #44
  15. Reppin501

    Reppin501 The People's Champ Full Member

    21,962
    3,344
    Apr 26, 2010
    No it wasn't...what's suspicious is that you refuse to acknowledge that you're wrong, "a clear round for Pacquiao"...SMFH.
     
    Reppin501, Jun 17, 2012
    Reppin501, Jun 17, 2012
    #45
Page 3 of 4