Pernell Whitaker: Defensive fighter or Offensive fighter with great defense?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Flo_Raiden, Jun 19, 2012.

  1. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2010
    Messages:
    18,761
    Likes Received:
    29,478
    Do you consider Whitaker as a defense-first type of fighter or an offensive fighter with great defense?
     
  2. brnxhands

    brnxhands Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2011
    Messages:
    9,905
    Likes Received:
    11
    Hes defense def stands out as his game, but he was well rounded all over with great offense. But i considet him a defensive fighter first n foremost. if he didnt have that great d he wouldn't have been as great as he is obviously
     
  3. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    42,571
    Likes Received:
    3,764
    Impossibly well-rounded. He didn't even need power. His D obviously stands out due to how flashy it was.
     
  4. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    12,028
    Likes Received:
    106
    'Defensive fighter with great offense' is clearly the most apt description. :bart
     
  5. Bobo

    Bobo Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    3,050
    Likes Received:
    5
    defensive doesn't necessarily mean great defense....:think Take Wlad Klitschko for example, well you can say he has good defense I guess
     
  6. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    20,449
    Likes Received:
    51
    I think being a great defensive boxer is about more than making the other guy miss. It's about making the other guy miss and pay for missing. Pernell Whitaker was a master at doing just that. No mater what you call him.