the question mark is for unverified fights you imbecile (meaning the commission report has not come in)
It should still say "Was voted robbery of the year by RING mag" under marquez/pac. they do "Was voted fight of the year by ring mag" so they really should.
Who cares, Bradley still has the W and Manny still has the L. I do find it funny though. Those 5 judges commissioned by the WBO were under tremendous pressure to come up with the correct verdict to please the angry (very biased) masses. And the funny part is most people will except this, even though it is clear all parties involved would only except one possible outcome, makes this a rigged decision. But nobody will care because they got there way lol. Oh well, that's the (corrupt) business, officially nothing has or will change Bradley is still 29-0 with 1 NC, Pacquiao is still 54-4-2, and there will still be a rematch that I will favor Pacquiao in again (even though I won $2,300 on Bradley )
Worst robbery I've ever witnessed, and nothing ever came of it. That's what irritates me about this nonsense, Pac-Bradley was a close fight, but just because the decision went against everyone's favorite they stage this crap. Now that they broke this seal, they better have a **** ton of actual robberies/terrible decisions lined up to re-judge and announce the rightful winner to the public. Otherwise this panel is just as "fixed" as any other fighter taking the dive or bought off judge in the long history of the subject.
People fails to understand that: Marquez vs Pacquiao was extremely close. Either one could had won the fight. It was 50/50, about equal. Bradley vs Pacquiao was one sided, no question on who won, loopsided victory. Understand that.
You fail to understand BOTH fight were close and the wrong man was declared the winner in both. I feel just as strongly as you do but regardless Bradley has a win over pac and pac has two over marquez. I think Bradley doesnt care what boxrec says either way. He is the new wbo champ and undefeated and thats all that matters to him.
The ? just means it's unverified. There's a bunch more of those on both Bradley's and Pac's record on Boxrec.
Not in my eyes but there nothing I can do about just like theres nothing we can do about Bradley beating pac.
Cane, from my point of view, ? red mark This content is protected mostly to boxers that fought outside the US coz they are far(see pac's early fights) and unverified. But to say a fight that happens in the US or esp. Las Vegas is rarely or sometimes called unverified instead of a green checkmark. In other words, the red ? mark means also questionable thats why they put in there.