How can people give the Pacquiao/Marquez fight to Marquez...Are you serious!!??

It depends on what you prefer, because everyone has biases. Many judges, maybe most, favour the guy who's coming forward, which Manny did. Even if Pacquiao's aggression wasn't overly effective most of the time, it was there for the majority of the fight. If your throwing more punches and being the aggressor, then it's going to look a lot better than simply counting punching on your back foot. If your someone who loves effective counter punching and use of aggression of other fighters against them, then you'll most probably go for Marquez. I just think Pacquiao was clearly the aggressor and that is what the judges were more impressed with. It was a close fight, I can't deny that....But in my opinion, it was simple to see Pacquiao won the fight with his aggression. I don't know if the stepping on the toes from marquez was deliberate, but it probably took Pacquiao out of his stride, and that could have been what Marquez was looking to do.

This content is protected

 

JMM won the 3rd fight and this is coming from a big pac fan

he made pac look silly at times


edit: just realised im in a troll thread.

 

The Mexican TV gave it to JMM and he cried robbery in the locker room but question the main is whether if he deserved a decision if it was not in the second fight rather than in the third fight... Basically JMM at 38 is close to call it a day and his work ethics and tremendous willpower has taken him to question a IV match. I've said it b4 and I am sayin it again, Manny plays the new born Christian and the sportsmanlike conduct and goes to Mexico and he is throwing 40 mil at least out of the widow. Why doesn't he rematch Bradley, win that and then make use of his 40 mil to help children in the Philippines? I mean give all your money to the poor of your home country, that is having love for the person next to you and to God - which are the same commandments of the New Testament!!! Pacquiao in my opinion just wants to play Bob Arum games and this is not even entertaining.

 

Your obviously a ******* with no Boxing knowledge. Just delete your account before you make a fool of yourself even more

 

Honestly, I can't even see how the **** you gave it to Pac, when he was clearly the loser.

 

Can't believe guys who clearly know their stuff are taking the bait here.

 

yeah!!! pacquiao is waaay more popular!!! plus he punches harder than anyone else and has the best footwork ever!!! have u seen his calves!? there is no way in hell pacquiao lost that fight!!! did you hear the fans!? lampley/lederman/punchstat all had pacquiao winning clearly!!! there is no way!!!

 

BIG DIFFERENCE between aggression and effective aggression. Learn how to score! Aggression that isn't effective counts against the fighter and gives the opponent extra credit in the way of ring generalship+ defense which are scoring criteria that is used if a round is tied in clean punching (marquez clearly landed the cleaner shots in most rounds so no need to go there but if you had to Marquez clearly had the better ring generalship and defense on top of landing the cleaner punches...it's a no brainer to score for Marquez really).

 

Sorry noob, your post made you a official *******. I didn't even notice the foot stomping until *******s brought it up. Why don't you mention pac stepping on jmm? There is vids that show pac stepping on jmm. Anyway both guys are atg's and quit trying to discredit jmm, he's pacs daddy.

 

fail!!!!