My Current P4P Top 30

Right guys, I feel my list is pretty damn good (in a non big headed way) so be harsh if you must, give praise if you agree and tell me where you think people should go up and down, or if I'm missing someone. (was tempted to put Uchiyama at 30 but decided with Lara)

1. Mayweather
2. Marquez
3. Pacquiao
4. Martinez
5. Donaire
6. Ward
7. Wladimir
8. Gamboa
9. Dawson
10. Bradley
11. Froch
12. Vitali
13. Moreno
14. Hernandez
15. Cotto
16. Nishioka
17. Salido
18. Hopkins
19. Mares
20. Viloria
21. Gonzalez (Roman)
22. Khan
23. Kessler
24. Joyi
25. Rigondeaux
26. Broner
27. Alvarez
28 Chavez Jr
29. Matthysse
30. Lara

Just to explain the JMM 2 Pac 3 and Bradley 10, the logic behind it is obviously the fact that Pac has now been robbed, he has no right to be ahead of JMM and that Bradley should go down slightly after his performance which should have merited a loss.

 

...

 

Delete please xxx :smooch

 

Well I see Cotto being a lot like Hatton. Loses to the number 1/2 p4p fighter in the world and gets put around the 10 Mark, has a few wins against sub par competition, then gets beat by the number 1/2 p4p fighter in the world, leaving him between 15-20 Mark. Had he have fought better opposition in between the pac and may fights then you could argue him to be around the top 10, but Foreman, a shot Mayorga and a one eyed margarito ain't really that impressive to me and barely even kept him in my top 10

 

I had a real dialema with the Peterson Khan ratings. I still think the whole Peterson-Khan situation is tough to rate. Personally I wanted to put Khan above him, but kept forgetting about it as I was putting my list together, Khan might go up pretty drastically. I've already explained Cotto and Alvarez is a tough one, due to all of the hype he receives. I had around 15 and thought about who he had fought and realised he needed to be moved down, I'd say around the 20 area isn't out of the question for Saul. Gambia is based mire in ability, as is Moreno, but I fee there resumes are pretty damn good in this point of time, although you
could certainly argue dropping them a few places. Vilora is quite a tough one as I've never rated Calderon that highly, obviously making Segura's win a lot less important and resulting in a less impressive impression on me when Vilora beat him. Much appreciated

 

:good the Boxrec p4p ratings are certainly misleading. They made me rethink his rating and I had him around 12 and then thought to myself that Boxrec can go do one and moved him down to 20,and you argue he should be lower as he really hasn't beat anyone that credible, gonna make a few adjustments right now

 

:good literally edited my list as you posted, looks a lot better now in my eyes, I an see the argument for PAC over Marquez but if that happens then Bradley must be treated the same and be given full credit for the win and surely leapfrog over Bradley? Also I think Wlad deserves to be top 10 but 6 is the highest I see him at this point in time.

 

Barker, a too level Euro fighter, certainly proved he was world class. Macklin, arguably the second best middleweight in the world ( he beat Sturm in my eyes ) and that Dzirunk or Whatever the **** his name is, although he was pretty poor. His comfortable win over Chavez will show us why he deserves to be in the top 5. Any feedback on the rest of the list?