I saw Pac winning 8 rounds out of 12. After the decision, Bradley was not sure if he really won the fight since he said in the post fight interview that he had to review the tape to see if he won or not, after hearing people reaction. It is amazing how some boxing fans dare to say that Bradley won this fight. What do you think it might be the reason why some fans say that Bradley won and why the judges gave the fight to Bradley ? [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW9RsJJ-neU[/ame]
I thought Bradley won rounds 1, 3, 7, 10-12 convincingly. So at best it would be a draw in my scorecard. Rounds 6 and 9 were close. I had round 6 a draw so that would be 115-114 Bradley.
Bradley survived on his feet only getting hurt in 4 or 5 rounds, so he translated a moral victory into winning the fight. The worst lies r the ones we tell ourselves.
I suggest you to score the fight with a pen and paper, the way judges do it. Also notice how often Bradley really connected or hurt Pac.
He did hurt Pacquiao. The HBO commentators painted Bradley as some powder puncher when he really isn't (he's undefeated for a reason). Bradley is not a puncher, but he hits hard enough that Pacquiao couldn't just walk through his punches. Pacquiao was covering up a lot and wincing in pain everytime Bradley landed clean shots to the head and body. And people always wondered why Pacquiao couldn't just blitz through Bradley, maybe it's because Pacquiao was missing so much, he was fatigued.
And New seriously this **** is old, Pac ****ed up and gave the fight away at the end when he tried to steal rounds, furthermore there were too many close rounds to call this a robbery.