Bradley won more rounds than Cotto won against Floyd!

Mayweather wanted the 8oz. gloves for the fight. Cotto didn't. Worried about floyd's punches getting through his defense, floyd wasn't worried about Cotto in 8oz. gloves. Pac- Bradley better than Floyd-Cotto, Whose rematch would you rather see?

 

:verysadNo he didn't. Tim won at most....3 rounds. Cotto won at least 4 and was competitive in EVERY round. Cotto was by far more compeitive with Floyd than Tim was with PAC.

Cotto did win the fight with Floyd but he gave a good account of himself. Tim got the "W" but didn't give a good account of himself which is why people are giving Tim such a hard time......Not that it's Tim's fault but he's on the front line simply because he was the guy who got the gift over PAC....even though he didn't have anything to do with the offical decision.

Cotto did kick Floyd's ass.....Floyd just kicked cotto's ass a little more which is why he deserved to win the fight. PAC kicked Tim's ass and didn't deserve the win.

 

Cotto hurt Mayewather? I remember Floyd acknowledging the shot that made his nose bleed, not that hurt. I also remember Cotto doing the drunken dance after eating upper-cuts. He was hurting.

 

Check the weight and the no-experienced trainer.

 

:deal

 

To turn your argument around, that actually give Floyd way more credit than Pac. Bradley has proved nothing compared to Cotto, because his best W came against an HBO hype job in Alexander

 

fight was at 154.

154 gloves are 10oz.

What else is there to discuss. Its all hot air. You can't even legaly box in Nevada with 8 oz gloves above 154.

 

Bradley won the 10th only for me, and surely MANY people agree. I gave Coto 3 rounds against Mayweather.

Cotto was clearly able to make his mark in that fight by busting Mayweather up, Bradley did nothing.

 

Cotto pushes Bradleys sh*t in, as does Floyd Mayweather

Thats all that matters.

Winning a few rounds doesnt cement legacies

 

Pacquiao was *not* the agressor in the last three rounds or for the majority of the second half of the fight.

 

:deal

 

You *****s are the biggest bunch of ***gots to ever grace this site. Just **** off. You cry about *******s, yet your just as bad if not worse. You cry about how "Peepells beez hatin' on Floyd" yet you spend endless hours making Bias videos on pac or moronic threads like this one.......every ****ing hour of every ****ing day.
Mayweather clearly beat cotto, and pac clearly beat Bradley(and was robbed)...just leave it at that.

 

but pacquiao clearly did not beat bradley.

pacquiao clearly did look average and lost to an injured boxer who doesn't eat meat.

 

Cotto won two clear rounds -- round 6 and round 8. In both those rounds, he landed solid punches on Mayweather.

Bradley won one clear round -- round 10. Even this was mainly because Pac wasn't doing anything in the round. Bradley was just more active.

Having said that, there were closer rounds in Pac vs Bradley, due to the fact that there weren't many clean punches landing. Bradley was just jabbing Pac's gloves and landing occasional bodyshots, while Pac was sitting around being inactive and landing a good left hand now and then.

 

That's the same as saying you're clearly ******ed.