Pac-Bradley Judges Not Found Guilty Of Any Wrongdoing

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boxing Fanatic, Jul 3, 2012.


  1. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    from fight_____

    The Nevada State Attorney General has sent a letter to Top Rank informing them that “no evidence of wrongdoing” was found in their investigation of the controversial June 9 clash between Timothy Bradley and Manny Pacquiao. According to the Las Vegas Review Journal the matter is closed unless someone comes forward with criminal allegations.
     
  2. ThaWiseJester

    ThaWiseJester Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,401
    1
    Mar 28, 2009
    Great,even IF Pac won he is not the patron saint of boxing where we make exceptions... All this phony hype has been exaggerated,the guy will fight again soon..
     
  3. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    i would like to open an investigation on hbo for creating controversy where there was none. i think lampley/compubox/lederman all need to be investigated.
     
  4. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    im not surprised one bit. even arum said nothing will happen LOL
     
  5. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    12,240
    14
    Sep 1, 2007
    nothing needed to happen.
     
  6. P.M.

    P.M. Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,907
    0
    May 31, 2012
    It was a PR move more then anything, other then that a big waist of time. Best to move on to the next fight.
     
  7. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Good now we can all GTFOIAMO.
     
  8. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    Good, there was no need to investigate since Bradley was not the cash cow or more well known fighter. The judges were experience and scored how they saw it.
     
  9. Devildoc

    Devildoc Capo Di Tutti Capi Full Member

    11,804
    2
    May 18, 2009
  10. thawk888

    thawk888 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,967
    5
    Sep 16, 2011
    Wonderful.

    And NEEWWWW!
     
  11. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    I had already forgot about this fight...
    Didn't think twice about it until this thread.

    What's PAC up to these days???
    (Remember him)
     
  12. Zombieguy

    Zombieguy Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,989
    1
    Feb 6, 2011
    They should investigate how far the HBO commentators are buried up Pacquiao's ass.
     
  13. floyd_g.o.a.t

    floyd_g.o.a.t Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,735
    6
    Aug 7, 2010
  14. hofbrau

    hofbrau Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,944
    0
    Mar 20, 2011
    Of course theres nobody to blame because it is fixed
    If they let Pac win that fight then theres no more rematch
    and no more profit. Its all about money.
    This pac-bradley fight will be similar to pac-morales trilogy.
     
  15. Primenal

    Primenal Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,266
    6
    Feb 10, 2008

    Similar to Pac-Morales trilogy except... Not exciting at all LOL

    Do people care about the judges really not being found guilty? There's fights that are sometimes close, and people make outragous claims of "Robbery". Pac vs Marquez fights are a good example. Close fights, could of gone either way, the scores seem to reflect that.

    This fight is such a robbery it wasn't even worth me getting mad, or a lot of people to complain about. Hell, even Pac got robbed, and thought it was so rediculous/ funny he never even suggested it was a robbery. He said "Of course I beleive I won", and left it at that. Nothing was going to happen to these judges because it was just part of the fix. Only thing is at least Bradley could of been a little more competitive.