Don't understand HBO ANYMORE! DONAIRE, PAC, etc!

It seems if though the HBO crew has their mind made up on who is going to win before the fight happens. SMH

In the PAC vs Bradley fight, The HBO cast sucked PAC's dick the entire fight. It didn't matter if PAC landed or missed, they went crazy every time he punched. They even counted punches that didn't land.

At the end of the fight, the punch stat showed that Pac landed 253 punches to 159 punches for Bradley and the whole HBO staff had Pac winning in a shutout (Which was completely ridiculous).

But in the Donaire fight, Mathebula outpunched Donaire by more than 400 punches (919-515) and connected on 80 more (231-151). And that same HBO cast had Donaire winning pretty much every round.

I'm not saying that Mathebula won the fight, but it was much closer than the scores resembled. If you go by the same standards in the PAC Vs Bradley fight, then you have to say Mathebula won the fight, he out punched and out landed.

Also I heard Max Kellerman say during the Donaire fight that Donaire landed the harder shots and more power shots. Well a power shot is anything other than a jab and my second question is how the **** DO THEY KNOW HOW HARD A PERSON HITS (Can they feel the punches?) Donaire face was pretty busted up yesterday yet he won in a shutout out!


The bottom line is that when HBO got their mind made up, they got their mind made up!

 

Yes I did. The technical definition of a "Power punch", is anything other than a jab. So a slapping hook with no power on it is considered a "Power Punch". There were rounds in the Donaire fight, that donaire only landed like 4 "Power Punches" by definition but Mathebula landed like 16 jabs, which ultimately busted up his face. So how do you say that Donaire won a round where he was punched 10-20 more times?




My question is how do Boxing so called experts and judges disregard "jabs"? I thought that a jab is a scored punch.

 

MAn I not going to get in a verbal war with you, but it you think you can visually tell who landing the harder shots then you must be an XMEN.

I agree that when Tyson fought McNealy he was hitting him harder because he was controlling the fight. If he wasn't controlling the fight then Mike would of been constantly landing punches. Wlad did hit Haye harder because Haye ****** ass wasn't punching. But in the Bradley fight, I didn't see anybody hit harder than the other. Bradley landed some great shot to Pac's body and Pac landed some great shots to Bradley head, but either one of them was in so much terrible you thought they were going to fall.

My answer to your crazy comment "

This content is protected

.[/quote]"

First of all young man we are talking about boxing, not street fighting. In a three minute round, if you hit me with two left hooks which are considered "Power shots" no matter how hard they land and I control the action of the fight with ten jabs, then I believe I won the round. I mean if you hit me with one of your two hooks and it leaves me dazed, then its a different story. But if I take your hooks and not be raddled, then get to stick that jab in your face 10 times compared to your two hooks then you dam right I won that round.

 

I totally understand where you come from, but a jab is the most important punch in boxing. If a person can consistently land a jab, he has a strong chance of controlling and dictating the fight. I just hate when judges disregard jabs. I see far too many times in boxing where one fighter throws all power punches "Anything but a jab no matter the power" and he gets more credit then the fighter who constantly sticks his ass with a jab.


I box before, and I been hit with a jab that feels like a ****in Right Cross.