You apparently don't realize competition is relative. Wlad's competition would be considered better if he was a worse fighter and didn't dominate and ruin all of his opponents.
Why do Klit fanatics always bring race into a conversation? You guys are second only to Averagemekians in your stupidity.
yeah right, i guess guys who post that only white racist and nazis can have wlad top 10 atg in hw are white people!atsch that is as much racism as i put out. and no i'm not racist my favorite boxer is Mike Tyson. I just call it as i see it!:hi:
Agreed. If Wlad and Vitali weren't fighting, the perception would be that the heavyweight division is much better than the perception of it is now. It's only because Wlad and Vitali are so far above everyone else, that somehow the division is seen as "no good". In reality it's a good division right now, that happens to have two great fighters at the top.
obv Klitmans not bad but dont you guys get that you are being suckered by a really decent marketing team who are selling you a Ford in place of an Aston Martin? If I was being so cheated I would want my money back, I wouldnt want to be taken for a ride.
Put it this way. Wlad's best win was over Chris Byrd, a guy who was soundly beaten by Fres Oquendo during his prime. The.look on Byrd's face knew he'd been gifted the decision, he fought the 12th round like he needed a knockout and the crowd chanted "bull****" after the fight. And that is Wlad's best win, by a fair distance. The great Chris Byrd, a boxer who was outboxed by Fres Oquendo. I think it's far more realistic to say that this is an unprecedented era. It's devoid of talent like never before.
Over 6 years of domination, 13 straight wins and 11 KO's and he's still improving. When the new challengers step up I think they will be in for a shock at how good Wlad is.