He might be. This is not an insult to Khan or Breland. I just think there are simmalitares between the two's careers. Comming out of the 1984 Olympics Mark Breland was suposed to be the next great boxer. Even though he had a secusfull career he never lived up to the great hopes that many people had for him. After the 2004 Olympics Amir Khan was given the same high hopes. Like Breland He's had a sescfuell career, but has not lived up to the expations comming out of the Olympics.
Another insult. Khan ****in blows! He has ZERO skill, or intelligence. Davis was faster than Khan, and had actual SKILLS. He nearly beat Edwin Rosario for Christ sake. Rosario would have ended Khan's world within 2 rounds.
Put Davis in this **** poor era and he most certainly wins a belt. Put Khan in Davis' era, and he's a nobody.
Some ******ed **** gets said on this general forum I swear. Terry Norris? Khan couldn't wipe Norris' ass. It's not a valid comparison, because Norris had more talent in one nut than Khan has in his body.
