Scoring Pac v Bradley

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Cojones, Jul 17, 2012.


  1. prelude

    prelude Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,924
    7
    Nov 12, 2010
    It's funny how one of the judge said he gave Pacquiao the first 6 rounds but Bradley took over the second half...but his scored card read 7-5 for Bradley. He also said he scored for Bradley because the old Pac would have finished Bradley when Bradley was hurt, where the current Pac couldn't do that :lol:.
     
  2. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010

    :lol:
     
  3. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    51 boxing writers....48 thought pacquiao won, 3 thought bradley won.

    only 1 in 10 of the viewing public thought bradley won.

    if you also scored it for bradley, you seriously need to re-analyze how you score fights.
     
  4. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010

    not really.

    Pac only won 5 rounds clearly. and bradley 1. So therefore technacly, it isn't incorrect scoring it for Bradley.

    The boxing scoring system is flawed.
     
  5. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011

    Enough with this! Most people know Pac won. Only Pac haters will agree that he lost :lol:
     
  6. P4P_Hero

    P4P_Hero Guest

    Seen the fight 3 times I think and I cannot see how the **** people think Bradley won.:huh
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,193
    46,432
    Mar 21, 2007
    The media reaction is perhaps the most overwhelming in history. The only one that comes anything near to competing is Sharkey-Schmeling. For people in the stadium, it's a no-brainer.
     
  8. prelude

    prelude Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,924
    7
    Nov 12, 2010
    Well if Bradley doesn't get hurt or knock down in a round then I suggest they think Bradley won that round.
     
  9. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    How come your list doesn't include Thomas Hauser and Brian Kenny?
     
  10. kapaykapay

    kapaykapay New Member Full Member

    32
    0
    Apr 17, 2011
    AS if it will make a difference :patsch
     
  11. roversbowers

    roversbowers Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,960
    0
    Jun 10, 2009
    I watched it twice, the first on HBO with sound. I scored it 119-109 Pacquiao

    the second time i watched with no sound. I scored it 116-112. The first time i was influenced by Lampley but nevertheless it was still a Pacquiao solid victory.

    Anyone who thinks otherwise is a Pacquiao hater or stupid.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,193
    46,432
    Mar 21, 2007
    117-111 the first time,116-112 the second time. I chanced the sound both times...

    I do think it was a little more up for question for people watching on TV. But for the guys who were ringside - the guy smost immune to Lampley I would guess - have it almost universally for Bradley. That shouldn't be ignored, certainly not in favour of a handful of TV scorecards.
     
  13. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010

    its off boxrec, not my list.
     
  14. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010

    :huh