Not sure.. Either way we're not paying, and if the fighters or promoters are fine paying why should we care? Not like anyone is forcing them to.. It wouldn't that close to the fight.. but isn't one of Pac's fans biggest argument against testing up to the fight the assumption that nobody will use PEDS that close? Why can't we use that here? :huh Either way, Floyd has been willing to do USADA for all of his fights thus far, I don't think cost is something that would deter them.
Because Arum had to build a stadium, so they could get past the no testing excuse and have another.. This one would place all the blame on Arum, which majority of the Pac fans have now done.
should TMT adopt a cut-off on testing because a postive test result very close to the fight could be vey costly for them as a company just starting up??
vote... cheaper and more effective? more expensive and appear to be less effective? no extra testing?
Why do you not think using logic? the odds are the fights of higher importance/make alot of money will go through extra testing like all fights at that level should, the fights making less money will likely go through no extra testing as the company still needs to break profit and the fighters need to get paid. The likelihood is you already knew this, but I feel that you are just trying to make some point about Mayweather than no one is listening to.
this thread is purely a speculation on what/who TMT will choose? as you know, they signed Berto and this question will again come up in the future.
I just don't understand why you're asking when you very likely already know the answer. Berto if he is viewed as innocent should have to go under extra testing even if the other guy isn't.