Hopkins is 47 and he fights Dawson, Vitali is 41 and he fights Charr

Lol

That says it all really

 

yeah but Hopkins is not a Klit.

he is an ATG.

 

Damn Lol only like 3 posts in this thread and the ownage is level 10 on the Richter scale

 

I didn't think the Vitali/Charr fight could look any worse. I was wrong.

BHop >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Vitali.

 

How funny would it be if cherry-picked Diamond Boy commits geezercide as clearly as Bad Chad did? :yep

 

Tbf he only boxing him once.

The other was a wrestling/back-climbing match.

 

That would be awesome in many ways, although I really respect Vitali and prefer the Klit losses be pegged on his non-engaging brother.

 

meh...who's left really...besides lil brother?

 

And when Bernard Hopkins turned 41, he fought Howard Eastman, who really wasn't very good either.

I say we should wait until Vitali is 47 before we pass fair judgement. What if he fights a P4P stud at that age? We just can't possibly know!

:think

 

Lets be real Dawsons stock took a dive when he was dominated by Pascal

 

To add on, it is very likely that Hopkins will fight Nathan Cleverly, in the UK, before the year is out.

Want to talk about fighting anyone, anytime, and anywhere, tell me how many boxers nearing their 48th birthday are willing to fight a prime, undefeated Champion fighter in the opponent's home country? Keep in mind, this isn't the first time Hopkins is doing this. After his 45th birthday, Hopkins went to Canada to face Jean Pascal not once, but TWICE!

 

vitali would of got respect facing The Hayemaker david haye, rather then thjis nobody.

solis looked good against vitali till that freak accident.

face haye vitali and get more respect.

 

:deal

I'm not even a Vitali fan, but some of the hate he gets is ridiculous. Other than his brother, the rest of the HW is absolute ****. Which bum would people see him face instead of Charr. No matter who he fights, it's guaranteed it's either a previous Klitschko victim, or a bum.