Interesting, so Glen Johnson KO'd the best fighter of the 90's, had wins over Tarver & Griffin, upsets Allan Green, wins IBF light heavy title, been on HBO, ESPN FNF & Showtime and faced over 11 world champions in several countries (robbed a few times) but yet most still feels he comes up short. Arturo Gatti is way popular than Johnson but in no way acheived the same success Johnson had in the ring. Arturo Gatti 64% yes Glen Johnson 42% yes http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=422955 :bart
I get your point. IMO, they both deserve to be hall of famers but I would rank Glen Johnson as the better fighter as he fought better competition and beat some of them. Being inducted to the hof requires you to meet different criterias in which both did but I just feel like because Gatti's name is more popular outside of the boxing world, people are quick to throw him into the HOF without fully analyzing his career in depth.
Johnson also did have a lot of bad losses though, not all of which were robberies. On the complete opposite end of the spectrum, I think Sven Ottke, who was denied entry this last vote, is more deserving. Heck, the trio of Benn, Eubank and Collins are also more deserving. I like Glen Johnson, he was one of my favorites, but I think he just misses like those guys did.
Dude deserves it more than some, I mean his notable wins speak for them selves, on top of that he did what most boxer's still don't do to this day that was fight everybody in their back yards. Who does that? Johnson, I admire and respect
no doubt, don't get where these guys got that from......that said I bet any money he will get in underservingly, so will Ricky Hatton. At the same time I bet Johnson who's more deserving than either of those guys will not.