Who's #1 Champion in every division?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Chempasillo, Aug 9, 2012.


Page 3 of 3
  1. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008

    Well I'd put Floyd there but we don't know if he's ever gonna fight at 147 again. As for Pac before the Bradley fight he lost to JMM at WW so we cannot rank him there either. And although I though Pac beat Timmy in a close but clear decision the first time around, it was obvious that by the end of the fight Tim was winning rounds and figured out how to box Pac. In a rematch with 2 good ankles Timmy would employ that strategy from the get go and have a real good chance of winning legitimately. WW is a hard one to pick ATM, it's ntot like we can rank berto there and Pac deserved to lose to JMM and had a very close fight with Timmy that Tim got the nod in. So if we wanna go by who deserved to win then Pac lost to JMM and beat Timmy but if we go by whats official Pac lost his last fight, either way he's 1 and 1 in his last 2, not enough to rank #1 at the weight.
     
    Royal-T-Bag, Aug 10, 2012
    Royal-T-Bag, Aug 10, 2012
    #31
  2. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008

    what it is my brutha
     
    Royal-T-Bag, Aug 10, 2012
    Royal-T-Bag, Aug 10, 2012
    #32
  3. Elliot

    Elliot Boxing Addict banned

    5,304
    0
    Jan 22, 2012
    No, that's #1, the #1 champion is the best person holding a world title, and these aren't always the same guy.
     
    Elliot, Aug 11, 2012
    Elliot, Aug 11, 2012
    #33
  4. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,612
    2,508
    Nov 6, 2011
    Super Bantamweight has to be Nishioka :-( pity on those picking rigo or donaire
     
    Webbiano, Aug 11, 2012
    Webbiano, Aug 11, 2012
    #34
  5. Chempasillo

    Chempasillo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,431
    1
    Feb 5, 2011
    very good list!!!

    pacquiao's power is always gonne be to much for timmy, tim would never win vs pac. overrated.


    1 champion in the world, #1 in the world in the world is the same for me. you don't need 0 belt to call champ. for me, when you call someone champion, in a serious way, than you speak of someone of is the #1 in the world at his weight, call it old school, but that's it for me, with countless belts, you can't take organization outside of the ring belt to seriously.

    lets say canelo has 2 belts at 154 and floyd has 0, yet he beat cotto, who is now the overall champ at 154, surely not canelo!!
     
    Chempasillo, Aug 11, 2012
    Chempasillo, Aug 11, 2012
    #35
  6. Henke67

    Henke67 One of the 45% Full Member

    9,468
    377
    Feb 10, 2009
    I think you've got it dead-on. Hard to disagree with any pick here.
     
    Henke67, Aug 11, 2012
    Henke67, Aug 11, 2012
    #36
Page 3 of 3