I believe marquez will fight like this....

If for some unforseen reason it does'nt turn out like I envisioned it, believe me my friend, I will still be here discussing the events regardless.
I'm a boxing fan first and foremost. If I'm wrong, it wont be the first or the last time.

To tell you the truth SS, its like Reed_man said, I'm enjoying making you Pac hardcores squirm and get nervous now.
Once the fight is over and JMM wins, I'll say it with all honesty. I'll be a sport about it. I'll be happy for JMM, but I'll feel for the many Pac hardcores on this site who had their heart broken.
I wont be rubbing it in their faces unless provoked. Thats why I'm having my fun now! :tong

 

Marquez can win this fight. It is a tossup.

 

Im sorry to dissappoint you, your childish attacks doesn't have any effect on me whatsoever. You're a Marquez fan first and foremost. That's where the problem lies. A true boxing fan will argue with facts, not blind bias. And not take a dig at anybody who is against your opinion on every chance you can get.

Go on, have your fun. Nobody is forbidding you.

And by the way, I see you can only be a sport when Marquez wins. I can't wait to see you along with reed_man0 and Uliuli sob when the cold, hard truth unveils itself on Mar 15.

 

Its too bad you feel that way SS. Whether they agree with them or not, I think most Pac fans around here would tell you that I've backed up my beliefs of a JMM victory with solid reasons, and not blind loyalty or bias as you've stated.

 

JMM KOed!

 

I thought Marquez won the first fight. I am neurtal on this fight, but I can see Marquez winning on his boxing skills. PAC has a lot of explosive power and could win, but I will not be surprised if Marquez wins this fight.

 

No offense divac, but my first impression of you was your a Marquez fan but with logic and does not in any way fall to a Pac-fanatic trap of arguing with alot of emotions and outright disrespecting someone's opinion and calling him nuthugger just because he does not share you views.

But as I stay on this forum longer and longer I've noticed a decline on you as a debater and that you seem to be getting so caught up with alot of Pac nuthuggers bashing JMM and JMM fans, that you yourself are rapidly turning into one(for JMM).

I'm sorry but you calling SugarShane a nuthugger does not in any way entail that you are "playing with the pac hardcores". It seems to me your getting so caught up of the fact that there are just alot of boxing fans favoring Pac over your favorite JMM, and that a small faction of Pac fanatics are discrediting JMM so much that you've somehow decided to call those boxing fans Pac nuthuggers, just to feel good.

That's nuthuggery to me, mate. Again this is just a friendly reminder. Don't fall into their trap, buddy.

 

Thats the post right there Sting, that entrapped me to call SS a nuthugger.

Its no secret in this forum that SS is a bonafide Pac fan, and for him to say "I hope not for his sake," was a bad choice of words on his part, knowing that he is a Pac fan who will be rooting against JMM against Pac.

I took him too task in good natured rubbing fun. That was the intention on my part. I dont believe calling someone a nuthugger around here is disrespecting. That term is thrown around here loosely.
Personally I'm not offended when I'm called a JMM nuthugger, unless what follows that statement is degrading to myself or the forum.

Sorry some of you folks feel that way, but I dont feel there is anything wrong with good natured poking fun of. It leads to the thread continuing, which in turn in alot of cases lead to serious debating of the thread topic.

The first time you see me bad naturedly degrading someone's opinion and using foul language to follow, you certainly can take me up on it.

 

stay in front of him in the early rounds?:verysad i think he will play safe and box him early only to fight back when he is in troble and then get alittle braver down the stretch.

 

Guns blazing?
If that plan of attack does'nt work, and does'nt even faze JMM, where will that leave Pac energywise heading into the mid-rounds.

Guns a blazing is fine and dandy if it works, the down side is that no fighter worth his salt wants to be in a position where quite a bit of his energy is expended of the assault fails its intended purpose.

As a JMM fan, I'd welcome Pac come at JMM like Hagler did Hearns.
It would keep me on the edge of my seat no doubt, but once the initial assault has subsided, as a JMM fan I'd salivate at what would be to come!:bbb

There's a few Pac fans all of a sudden getting offended by my posts, talk to me Domngo pal!

 

:good

Excellent post. I totally agree with your analysis.

 

These posts adds spice to the upcoming fight. Its why we get addicted to forums because we get to say what we want, biased or not. And after every fight, some are humbled and the victorious fans will rub it in!! I love it! even when im on the losing end because it makes me evaluate my fighter more. Pac will win despite the great technical abilities of JMM, yes with disregard to that talent, i am still confident in my pick because i just cant see Pac losing to him (i have reservations to some opponents in the division tho and i wont hesitate to admit it if it comes).

 

Jinky pacquaio KO 1 by way of smiling. Peace

 

Pac hurt his left hand at the second knockdown w/ marquez If you watch the fight once again... You will notice that Pac is trying to use his right, And his right hand is not that accurate compare to now. So, Pac fight w/ marquez at the first fight w/ one hand only coz he cant use his left after the 1st round.
If Marquez is good enough in that fight, he should manage to demolished Pac? In this 2nd fight, I believe that it will be a quick fight.. Like the Pac/Morales III....Pac by K.O at early rounds...

 

So he didn't agree with you about Pac not backpedaling against JMM and how JMM's gameplan of staying in front of Pac would be ill-advised. That still does not give you the right to call him a nuthugger. Was he insulting JMM like what the Pac nuthuggers do? Was he degrading JMM at all? He's offering up an opinion, bro.

I know that Pac backpedalled against JMM quite a few times. I strongly agree with you on that. But it doesnt mean we should just expect everybody to believe in it just because its common knowledge(or even if its a fact). He obviously didn't see it that way. Could be for alot of reasons, intead of just nuthuggery. And yes SS is a bonafide Pac fan, but he's not a bonafide Pac fanatic. I've seen his posts and I have yet to see him do a post that degrades Pac's opponents in any way. He obviously is for Pac but he does offer constructive posts as well. Just because he's always for Pac does not mean hes a nuthugger. Your always for JMM does that make you a nuthugger?

Same with JMM staying in front of Pac, most people agree that its not in JMM's best interest to have exchanges against Pac. That what SS was also trying to say, nothing else. I don't think he had any other meaning in his post. Don't let a single phrase rile you up, man.

And whether or not nuthuggery is a loose term here or whether or not your just poking on him(which I honestly don't see based on your response to him) it does not really matter. Judging by his responses back to you, he was clearly offended by it(as are most of the posters here whenever theyre called nuthugger).