If Pac takes Floyd's drug tests and fails them, what good is that to Floyd?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Raskolnikov, Dec 15, 2010.


  1. esrotak

    esrotak newbie +1 Full Member

    976
    0
    Aug 20, 2010
    Floyd did a great job covering his own ass from an ass-beating.


    Watch this.


    http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=espn:8406952
     
  2. BretN

    BretN Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,088
    1
    Feb 23, 2012
    Neither did Ortiz
    Neither did Cotto
     
  3. BretN

    BretN Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,088
    1
    Feb 23, 2012
    If Floyd was just using the drug tests as a reason to duck Pacquiao, why not just call his bluff and agree? Hmmmmmm I wonder
     
  4. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    :lol: spare us the drama. you guys love to exaggerate like your idol floyd "i lost 15 pounds of muscles so i can't fight pochiao" mayweather jr.
     
  5. ThaWiseJester

    ThaWiseJester Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,401
    1
    Mar 28, 2009
    Manny will pass now because he waited 3 years to take a test! He dodged him and wants a big payday now he decides to call out Floyd..
     
  6. esrotak

    esrotak newbie +1 Full Member

    976
    0
    Aug 20, 2010

    Pac had been fighting atleast twice a year during that 3 year period. So you're saying that Pac never get tested during that period?

    Btw, we all agree that Floyd is capable of beating Pac and vise versa. That's why we all need to see it happen. Floyd should take a tune up while waiting for the outcome between Pac/JMM. I don't think a fight with Martinez will be a good option if he's really planning on facing Pac next year.
     
  7. Sunchild78

    Sunchild78 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,721
    50
    Sep 25, 2009
    Thinking and knowing are two different things. I would rather know if I'm fighting a cheater or not.
    1. It would ease my mind in knowing he's on the same playing field as I am.

    2. Sixty mill is a lot of money, but if I already have a lot and can make that sixty mill in two fights, that doesn't require me guessing if my opponent is cheating or not, then option B would be my choice.

    Look at the situation as two gun fighters, competing to see who's best, and one fighter suspects the other to have on body armor under his clothes, but the so call suspect don't want to cooperate by revealing if he does or doesn't. Even though GF #1 believes he could take GF #2, should he still compete? Should GF #1 wins then he proves he is the best. Should he loose, and GF #2 was wearing the armor, then GF #1 dies and there is no coming back. For the boxer that would be a lost on his record, that most likely won't be overturned by the boxing commission, even though Pac did cheat to win. Sure there could be a rematch, but the record of the undefeated fighter would still be tainted with the lost.